Multiple Vulnerabilities in IBM API Connect
Affects IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 and 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12. IBM's listed fix is version 12.1.1.3.
Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.
- Exploited
- No known exploitation
- Fix
- Fixed in 12.1.1.3
- Who is exposed
- Specific setups only
Do first: Check whether your setup matches what the bug needs. Submitted definitions with externally referenced content are processed without sufficient restriction on those references
- Last modified
- FIRST's estimate of the chance attackers exploit it in the next 30 days, updated daily.What do these mean? →
- 0.44% · 38th percentile
- A 0-100 score for how much a CVE matters across the industry: exploitation, exposure, how widely the software is used, severity and whether a fix exists.What do these mean? →
- 18/100 · provisional
- How many real-world setups can hit the bug, from the vendor's advisory and CISA data. It does not know your setup.What do these mean? →
- Specific setups only
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
Summary
IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform arbitrary file reads and server-side request forgery due to unrestricted resolution of external references. Externally referenced content in submitted definitions is not sufficiently restricted when processed, and the retrieved content could be returned to the attacker.
cve.now Index
- Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
- Exposure8/25Specific setups only, reachable over the network
- Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
- Severity9.6/10CVSS 9.6
- No patch0/5No signal
What would change the score
- Would score about 68 if added to CISA KEV
- Would score about 63 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
- Would score about 25 if CISA's SSVC rates it automatable
What to do
Check whether your setup matches what the bug needs.
Submitted definitions with externally referenced content are processed without sufficient restriction on those referencesUpgrade to a fixed version: 12.1.1.3.
Timeline
- CVE published
- First seen by cve.now
- Posted on X by cve.now
Affected versions
- IBM API Connect
From 12.1.0.0 · through 12.1.1.2; From 10.0.8.0 · through 10.0.8.12
Evidence 2
- Patch
- Patch
Corrections
None so far.
Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.
Questions about CVE-2026-17299
Is CVE-2026-17299 being exploited?
It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data
What does this mean?
Submitted definitions that contain externally referenced content are not sufficiently restricted when processed. An attacker can perform arbitrary file reads and server-side request forgery, and the retrieved content could be returned to the attacker.Source: ibm.com, cve.org
Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-17299?
API Connect: from 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2; from 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12.Source: cve.now feed data