Skip to main content
← Vulnerabilities

[Eclipse CSI - otterdog] Unauthenticated remote code execution via eval() on format-string-injected webhook body when…

9.5CriticalCNA
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
Fixed in 1.3.2
Who is exposed
Default setups

Do first: Check every install: default setups are affected.

Published
Last modified
0.30% · 23rd percentile
42/100 · provisional
Default setups
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
On X
View the cve.now post

Summary

The Eclipse CSI otterdog webapp lets a remote attacker without logging in run arbitrary Python code on the host by sending a crafted GitHub webhook request. This works when the webhook secret is unset or empty, because the signature check is then skipped and the request body reaches an `eval()` call.

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

Read the original description

The otterdog webapp evaluates a format-string built from the incoming GitHub webhook JSON body using Python's eval(). When the GITHUB_WEBHOOK_SECRET configuration value is unset or empty (the code default is None), the HMAC signature check is skipped entirely, allowing an unauthenticated network client to reach the eval() sink with attacker-controlled input and execute arbitrary Python on the webapp host.

cve.now Index

42Pcve.now Index 42 of 100 · methodology v3 · provisional
  • Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
  • Exposure22/25Default setups, reachable over the network without a login
  • Reach10/20Affects PyPI packages
  • Severity9.5/10CVSS 9.5
  • No patch0/5No signal

What would change the score

  • Would score about 82 if added to CISA KEV
  • Would score about 77 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active

Impact

  • Widely used

    otterdog has 76 weekly downloads.Source: pypistats.org

What to do

  • Check every install: default setups are affected.

  • Upgrade to a fixed version: 1.3.2.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now
  3. Posted on X by cve.now

Affected versions

  • From 0.9.0 · fixed in 1.3.2

    Fixed in 1.3.2 (released May 7, 2026, 186 days before disclosure).

    The latest release, 1.7.1, is not affected.

Evidence 3

  1. Advisory
  2. Repository
  3. Link

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

Questions about CVE-2026-123870

Is CVE-2026-123870 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

What does this mean?

The otterdog webapp passes a webhook request body into eval() after format-string injection, so a remote party without a login can run arbitrary code as the webapp process, including arbitrary Python on the webapp host.Source: github.com

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-123870?

otterdog (PyPI): from 0.9.0 before 1.3.2.Source: cve.now feed data

Am I affected, and how do I check?

The condition text covers all versions of the otterdog webapp deployed from a source checkout or the ghcr.io/eclipse-csi/otterdog container, up to and including current main. The product range lists 0.9.0 through a fix at 1.3.2, so the two sources do not line up. To check a deployment, look at whether it runs from a source checkout or that container image and which otterdog version or commit it was built from.Source: github.com

How do I fix CVE-2026-123870?

The facts do not name a confirmed fixed release, so no upgrade target can be stated from them. The listed range ends at 1.3.2, but the condition text extends to current main, so confirm the fixed version in the Eclipse advisory before upgrading.Source: github.com