Skip to main content
Menu
CVEs

CVE

Copeland XWEB EVO local root command injection in setuid Lua CGI

Affects Copeland XWEB EVO before 5.6.2, where crafted input reaching a .lua CGI endpoint can run commands as root. Fixed in 5.6.2.

CVE-2026-124003EUVD-2026-124637GHSA-R68M-C6RG-86PF

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

8.5HighCNA
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
Fixed in 5.6.2
Who is exposed
Specific setups only

Do first: Check whether your setup matches what the bug needs. Product is XWEB EVO before 5.6.2. Malicious input must reach a .lua CGI endpoint handled by the setuid-root wlua interpreter.

Published
Last modified
Reference
Last checked
0.69% · 53rd percentile
15/100 · provisional
Specific setups only
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
  • Exploitation: none
  • Automatable: no
  • Technical impact: total

Summary

Copeland XWEB EVO contains a command injection flaw in a setuid-root Lua CGI interpreter that lets a locally logged-in attacker with low privileges run arbitrary commands as root. The attacker must be able to reach the device locally, and no user interaction is needed.

Read the original description

XWEB EVO before 5.6.2 contains a command injection vulnerability where the setuid-root Lua CGI interpreter wlua executes system("/usr/bin/lua "+argv) on unsanitized input. Attackers can craft malicious input reached through a .lua CGI endpoint to inject arbitrary commands into the concatenated argv string, achieving command execution with root privileges. This product line reached it's end of service date in March 2026.

Who should check

Teams running Copeland XWEB EVO controllers before 5.6.2, including owners of end-of-service units

Read the source excerpt

“XWEB EVO before 5.6.2 contains a command injection vulnerability”

vulncheck.com

cve.now Index

15Pcve.now Index 15 of 100 · methodology v3 · provisional
  • Exploitation0/40No signal
  • Exposure5/25Specific setups only
  • Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
  • Severity9.5/10CVSS 8.5, total technical impact per CISA
  • No patch0/5No signal

What would change the score

  • Would score about 65 if added to CISA KEV
  • Would score about 60 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
  • Would score about 25 if CISA's SSVC rates it automatable

What to do

  • Check whether your setup matches what the bug needs.

    Product is XWEB EVO before 5.6.2. Malicious input must reach a .lua CGI endpoint handled by the setuid-root wlua interpreter.
  • Upgrade to a fixed version: 5.6.2.

Check your systems with an agent

Paste this into a coding or ops agent. It checks your systems read-only and reports a table per asset.

Check whether my systems are affected by CVE-2026-124003 (Dixell/Copeland XWEB Setuid Lua CGI Root Command Injection), using the cve.now data below.

Rules: work read-only. Do not run exploit code, proof-of-concept scripts or scanners that send attack payloads, and do not change any configuration, package, image or deployment. Report findings only.

What cve.now has for CVE-2026-124003 (entry last updated 2026-11-13):
Affected:
- Copeland XWEB EVO: fixed in 5.6.2
Fixed versions: 5.6.2.
Conditions (all must be true for the bug to be hit):
- Product is XWEB EVO before 5.6.2. (source: https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/dixell-copeland-xweb-evo-setuid-lua-cgi-root-command-injection)
- Malicious input must reach a .lua CGI endpoint handled by the setuid-root wlua interpreter. (source: https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/dixell-copeland-xweb-evo-setuid-lua-cgi-root-command-injection)
Setup: unknown whether the bug needs a non-default feature or setting. Check the advisory.
Attacker needs: local access, low-privilege login, no user action.
CISA KEV: CVE-2026-124003 is not listed as of cve.now's last read.
This KEV status is for CVE-2026-124003 only. If you also check another CVE, look up its own KEV status; never assume it from this one.

How to check:
- Installed software: check what is actually running, not what a repo declares. Read the version from each host, container image and Kubernetes node (the binary's version output, the OS package database, image layers), and check whether the conditions above hold there. Distribution packages may carry a backported fix under an older version number; confirm against the distribution's own advisory.

Verify against the linked advisories before concluding, and cite the date you read each one:
- https://webapps.copeland.com/dixell/Content/Pages/AdvertisingMaterials/ProductNews/XWEB%20EVO%20EoS%20-%20Product_Bulletin_March_2026.pdf
- https://webapps.copeland.com/Dixell/Pages/SystemSoftwareUpdate
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/dixell-copeland-xweb-evo-setuid-lua-cgi-root-command-injection
Do not conclude an asset is unaffected unless you checked it and the evidence covers both its version and the conditions above. If you could not check something, mark it unknown and say what is missing.

Report a table with one row per asset and these columns: Asset | Version or build | Status (affected, fixed, not applicable, unknown) | Compensating controls | Exposure (internet-facing, internal, none) | Evidence | Next action.

Entry: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-124003
For follow-up questions, use the cve.now MCP server at https://mcp.cve.now/mcp (no authentication), for example execute with name cve.get and arguments {"id": "CVE-2026-124003"}.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now1 day
  3. CISA SSVC assessment

    Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total

  4. Record last updated

Affected versions

  • Copeland XWEB EVO

    fixed in 5.6.2

Evidence 5

Vendor advisory · 2

Establishes: Affected and fixed versions.

  1. Advisory
  2. Patch

CVE record · 2

Establishes: The identifier and description.

  1. Record
  2. Record

Other links · 1

  1. Link

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

Questions about CVE-2026-124003

Is CVE-2026-124003 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

What does this mean?

Malicious input sent through a .lua CGI endpoint can trigger command injection. The endpoint is handled by a setuid-root interpreter, so the injected commands run with root privileges on the device.Source: vulncheck.com

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-124003?

XWEB EVO: before 5.6.2.Source: cve.now feed data

Am I affected, and how do I check?

XWEB EVO versions before 5.6.2 are affected. To check a device, compare the XWEB EVO firmware version it reports with 5.6.2. The issue involves .lua CGI endpoints, so whether that path is reachable is part of the setup.Source: vulncheck.com

How do I fix CVE-2026-124003?

Upgrade to XWEB EVO 5.6.2, the fixed version listed for this vulnerability. The facts name no patch IDs or workaround.Source: vulncheck.com