Skip to main content
Menu
CVEs

CVE

Copeland XWEB EVO unauthenticated command injection via password field

Copeland XWEB EVO versions before 5.6.2 are affected. Fixed in 5.6.2.

CVE-2026-124007EUVD-2026-124649GHSA-R4P6-H89W-HG76

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

9.2CriticalCNA
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
Fixed in 5.6.2
Who is exposed
Not reported

Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 5.6.2.

Published
Last modified
Reference
Last checked
2.10% · 81st percentile
27/100 · provisional
Unclear
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
On X
View the cve.now post
  • Exploitation: none
  • Automatable: no
  • Technical impact: total

Summary

Copeland XWEB EVO contains a pre-authentication OS command injection flaw in its password field, which an attacker can reach remotely without logging in. By injecting shell metacharacters into that field, an attacker can run arbitrary commands with root-level privileges.

Read the original description

XWEB EVO before 5.6.2 contains a pre-authentication OS command injection vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands by injecting shell metacharacters into the password field. Attackers can exploit the unescaped interpolation of the password value into the hashpass invocation within login.lua, cleanout.lua, and api.lua to achieve root-level command execution via the setuid wlua interpreter. This product line reached it's end of service date in March 2026.

Who should check

Teams running Copeland XWEB EVO controllers before 5.6.2; the product line reached end of service in March 2026.

Read the source excerpt

“XWEB EVO before 5.6.2 contains a pre-authentication OS command injection vulnerability”

vulncheck.com

cve.now Index

27Pcve.now Index 27 of 100 · methodology v3 · provisional
  • Exploitation0/40No signal
  • Exposure17/25No login or user action needed, reachable over the network without a login · Unknown: Advisories don't say whether default setups are affected
  • Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
  • Severity10/10CVSS 9.2, total technical impact per CISA
  • No patch0/5No signal

What would change the score

  • Would score about 72 if added to CISA KEV
  • Would score about 67 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
  • Would score about 32 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed

What to do

  • Upgrade to a fixed version: 5.6.2.

Check your systems with an agent

Paste this into a coding or ops agent. It checks your systems read-only and reports a table per asset.

Check whether my systems are affected by CVE-2026-124007 (Dixell/Copeland XWEB EVO Pre-Auth OS Command Injection via Password Field), using the cve.now data below.

Rules: work read-only. Do not run exploit code, proof-of-concept scripts or scanners that send attack payloads, and do not change any configuration, package, image or deployment. Report findings only.

What cve.now has for CVE-2026-124007 (entry last updated 2026-11-13):
Affected:
- Copeland XWEB EVO: fixed in 5.6.2
Fixed versions: 5.6.2.
Conditions (all must be true for the bug to be hit):
- Copeland XWEB EVO versions before 5.6.2 (source: https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/dixell-copeland-xweb-evo-pre-auth-os-command-injection-via-password-field)
Setup: unknown whether the bug needs a non-default feature or setting. Check the advisory.
Attacker needs: network access, no login, no user action.
CISA KEV: CVE-2026-124007 is not listed as of cve.now's last read.
This KEV status is for CVE-2026-124007 only. If you also check another CVE, look up its own KEV status; never assume it from this one.

How to check:
- Installed software: check what is actually running, not what a repo declares. Read the version from each host, container image and Kubernetes node (the binary's version output, the OS package database, image layers), and check whether the conditions above hold there. Distribution packages may carry a backported fix under an older version number; confirm against the distribution's own advisory.

Verify against the linked advisories before concluding, and cite the date you read each one:
- https://webapps.copeland.com/dixell/Content/Pages/AdvertisingMaterials/ProductNews/XWEB%20EVO%20EoS%20-%20Product_Bulletin_March_2026.pdf
- https://webapps.copeland.com/Dixell/Pages/SystemSoftwareUpdate
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/dixell-copeland-xweb-evo-pre-auth-os-command-injection-via-password-field
Do not conclude an asset is unaffected unless you checked it and the evidence covers both its version and the conditions above. If you could not check something, mark it unknown and say what is missing.

Report a table with one row per asset and these columns: Asset | Version or build | Status (affected, fixed, not applicable, unknown) | Compensating controls | Exposure (internet-facing, internal, none) | Evidence | Next action.

Entry: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-124007
For follow-up questions, use the cve.now MCP server at https://mcp.cve.now/mcp (no authentication), for example execute with name cve.get and arguments {"id": "CVE-2026-124007"}.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now1 day
  3. CISA SSVC assessment

    Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total

  4. Record last updated
  5. Posted on X by cve.now

Affected versions

  • Copeland XWEB EVO

    fixed in 5.6.2

Evidence 5

Vendor advisory · 2

Establishes: Affected and fixed versions.

  1. Advisory
  2. Patch

CVE record · 2

Establishes: The identifier and description.

  1. Record
  2. Record

Other links · 1

  1. Link

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

Questions about CVE-2026-124007

Is CVE-2026-124007 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

What does this mean?

The XWEB EVO password field lets an unauthenticated attacker inject operating system commands before login. The injected commands run with root-level privileges via the setuid wlua interpreter.Source: vulncheck.com

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-124007?

XWEB EVO: before 5.6.2.Source: cve.now feed data

Am I affected, and how do I check?

XWEB EVO versions before 5.6.2 are affected. Check the XWEB EVO version installed on the device and compare it to 5.6.2.Source: vulncheck.com

How do I fix CVE-2026-124007?

Upgrade XWEB EVO to version 5.6.2 or later.Source: vulncheck.com