Disabled TLS Certificate Validation Enables MITM Attacks
- Exploited
- No known exploitation
- Fix
- No fix listed
- Who is exposed
- Not reported
- Last modified
- A 0-100 score for how much a CVE matters across the industry: exploitation, exposure, how widely the software is used, severity and whether a fix exists.What do these mean? →
- 30/100 · provisional
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
- Exploitation: none
- Automatable: no
- Technical impact: total
Summary
The LaserGest mobile application disables TLS certificate and hostname verification, so an attacker who can reach it over the network, without logging in or any user action, can intercept or modify its traffic, including credentials and API communications. The flaw lets a man-in-the-middle attacker impersonate the server to the app.
Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.
Read the original description
The LaserGest mobile application disables TLS certificate and hostname verification via setServerTrustMode("nocheck"), allowing a man-in-the-middle attacker to intercept or modify network traffic, including credentials and API communications.
cve.now Index
- Exploitation0/40No signal
- Exposure17/25No login or user action needed per the CVSS vector, reachable over the network without a login · Unknown: No advisory context yet
- Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
- Severity7.9/10CVSS 6.9, total technical impact per CISA
- No patch5/5No patch listed yet
What would change the score
- Would score about 75 if added to CISA KEV
- Would score about 70 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
- Would score about 35 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed
Timeline
- CVE published
- First seen by cve.now
- CISA SSVC assessment
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total
- Record last updated
Affected versions
- laservideo lasergest
1.0.18
Evidence 1
- Advisory
Corrections
None so far.
Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.
Questions about CVE-2026-112165
Is CVE-2026-112165 being exploited?
It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data
Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-112165?
lasergest: version 1.0.18.Source: cve.now feed data