- Exploited
- No known exploitation
- Fix
- Fixed in 1.2.0
- Who is exposed
- Not reported
Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 1.2.0.
- Last modified
- A 0-100 score for how much a CVE matters across the industry: exploitation, exposure, how widely the software is used, severity and whether a fix exists.What do these mean? →
- 10/100 · provisional
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
Summary
The surrealkv storage engine, used by SurrealDB's kv-surrealkv backend, can read memory before a buffer when it decodes internal keys shorter than 16 bytes, because its length check is removed from release builds. A crafted or corrupted SSTable file can trigger this through the normal on-disk decode path.
Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.
Read the original description
InternalKeyRef::from_encoded is a safe constructor whose only length check is debug_assert!(encoded.len() >= 16), which is compiled out in release builds. Its accessors perform unchecked length arithmetic on the slice: user_key() slices &encoded[..len - 16], trailer()/seq_num() pass len - 16 and timestamp() passes len - 8 to read_u64_be, which computes buffer.as_ptr().add(offset) and performs an 8-byte load. For a short slice the subtraction underflows usize, the pointer wraps below the allocation and eight bytes before the buffer are read (undefined behavior; confirmed with AddressSanitizer as a heap-buffer-overflow). In debug builds the same call panics instead.
The same invariant is missing at the on-disk decode boundary: BlockIterator::seek_next_entry rebuilds the current key from block bytes with upper-bound checks only, and BlockIterator::key() wraps it in InternalKeyRef, which surrealdb's kv-surrealkv backend then reads through key_ref.timestamp(). A crafted or corrupted SSTable therefore reaches the same unchecked subtraction without any unsafe at the call site.
1.2.0 rejects internal keys shorter than their 8-byte trailer before any accessor computes an offset and makes the accessors bounds-checked (fix in commit ac642f9, surrealdb 4.0.0 ships surrealkv 1.2.0).
cve.now Index
- Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
- Exposure?/25Unknown. No advisory context yet
- Reach10/20Affects crates.io packages
- Severity?/10Unknown. No CVSS score or vendor rating
- No patch0/5No signal
What would change the score
- Would score about 65 if added to CISA KEV
- Would score about 60 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
- Would score about 32 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed
What to do
Upgrade to a fixed version: 1.2.0.
Timeline
- Advisory published3 days
- Record last updated
Affected versions
- surrealkvcrates.io
From 0.0.0-0 · fixed in 1.2.0
Evidence 4
- Advisory
- Repository
- Repository
- Link
Corrections
None so far.
Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.
Questions about RUSTSEC-2026-0452
Is RUSTSEC-2026-0452 being exploited?
It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data
Which versions are affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0452?
surrealkv (crates.io): from 0.0.0-0 before 1.2.0.Source: cve.now feed data
How do I fix RUSTSEC-2026-0452?
Upgrade to a fixed version: 1.2.0.Source: cve.now feed data