- Exploited
- No known exploitation
- Fix
- Fixed in 0.6.3
- Who is exposed
- Not reported
Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 0.6.3.
- Last modified
- A 0-100 score for how much a CVE matters across the industry: exploitation, exposure, how widely the software is used, severity and whether a fix exists.What do these mean? →
- 27/100
- How many real-world setups can hit the bug, from the vendor's advisory and CISA data. It does not know your setup.What do these mean? →
- Unclear
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
Summary
The `codeq` serialization library, specifically its `Decode` implementations for `String` and `Vec<u8>`, is affected. Code that decodes untrusted input through `codeq` can be made to allocate up to about 4 GiB of memory from a tiny length prefix, which can exhaust memory and crash the process.
Read the original description
codeq is a serialization library whose Decode trait reads length-prefixed values. For String and Vec<u8>, the length-prefixed Decode implementations read a 4-byte big-endian length and allocate a buffer of that size before reading the payload. Because the declared length is taken straight from the input with no upper bound and no cross-check against the bytes actually available, a tiny input can force an allocation of up to ~4 GiB. Code that decodes untrusted data through codeq can therefore be made to spike memory use and be OOM-killed (CWE-400, uncontrolled resource consumption).
The affected path, in src/codec/impls/string_impl.rs:
impl Decode for String {
fn decode<R: io::Read>(mut r: R) -> Result<Self, io::Error> {
let len = r.read_u32::<BigEndian>()? as usize;
let mut buf = vec![0; len]; // allocates `len` bytes up front
r.read_exact(&mut buf)?;
String::from_utf8(buf).map_err(|e| io::Error::new(io::ErrorKind::InvalidData, e))
}
}Any code that decodes attacker-controlled bytes through codeq can be forcedcto allocate up to ~4 GiB per decode call from a 4-byte length prefix. On a service decoding untrusted input this is a cheap denial of service (crash / OOM-kill). The practical severity depends on how the embedding wires codeq to untrusted bytes.
Remediation
Fixed in 0.6.3, which grows the decode buffers as payload bytes actually arrive instead of pre-allocating the full declared length (commit 9f15313, "fix: codec: grow decode buffers as payload bytes arrive"). Upgrade to codeq >= 0.6.3.
cve.now Index
- Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
- Exposure17/25No login or user action needed, reachable over the network without a login · Unknown: Advisories don't say whether default setups are affected
- Reach10/20Affects crates.io packages
- Severity?/10Unknown. No CVSS score or vendor rating
- No patch0/5No signal
What would change the score
- Would score about 72 if added to CISA KEV
- Would score about 67 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
- Would score about 32 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed
What to do
Upgrade to a fixed version: 0.6.3.
Timeline
- Advisory published2 days
- Record last updated
- First seen by cve.now
Affected versions
- codeqcrates.io
From 0.0.0-0 · fixed in 0.6.3
Evidence 3
- Advisory
- Report
- Link
Corrections
None so far.
Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.
Questions about RUSTSEC-2026-0432
Is RUSTSEC-2026-0432 being exploited?
It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data
What does this mean?
A tiny crafted input can make codeq allocate a large buffer, up to about 4 GiB, when decoding. This can spike memory use and lead to an OOM-kill or a crash of the process.Source: github.com, rustsec.org
Which versions are affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0432?
codeq (crates.io): from 0.0.0-0 before 0.6.3.Source: cve.now feed data
Am I affected, and how do I check?
The bug is in codeq 0.6.2 and earlier. To check, look at the codeq version in the project's Cargo.lock or run cargo tree. It matters only for code that decodes untrusted data through codeq, such as String or Vec<u8> values read from network messages or on-disk records.Source: github.com, rustsec.org
How do I fix RUSTSEC-2026-0432?
Upgrade codeq to 0.6.3 or later, which contains the fix.Source: github.com, rustsec.org