Skip to main content
← Vulnerabilities

Aggregation queries can bypass authentication restrictions in @neo4j/graphql

Affects @neo4j/graphql 5.0.0 to 5.12.16 and 7.0.0 to 7.6.7 for applications using field-level @authentication. Fixed in 5.12.17 and 7.6.8.

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

8.7HighCNA
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
Fixed in 5.12.17, 7.6.8
Who is exposed
Not reported

Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 5.12.17, 7.6.8.

Published
Last modified
Reference
Last checked
36/100 · provisional
Unclear
93% of @neo4j/graphql downloads last week were affected versions (57.5K).npm, 61.5K downloads in the last 7 days, read Nov 10, 2026
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub

Summary

The @neo4j/graphql library is affected by a flaw in its aggregation queries that lets a remote attacker, without logging in, read data that should be protected. Field-level authentication is not enforced on string aggregates, and connection-root aggregates skip the entity's AGGREGATE authentication requirement, so unauthenticated callers can see stored values and aggregate results.

Read the original description

Missing Authentication for Critical Function in aggregation queries in Neo4j @neo4j/graphql 5.0.0 before 5.12.17 and 7.0.0 before 7.6.8 allows remote attackers to read protected data via GraphQL aggregation queries. Field-level @authentication is not enforced on string aggregates, which can return stored values verbatim, and connection-root aggregates bypass an entity's AGGREGATE authentication requirement, allowing unauthenticated callers to obtain aggregate results.

cve.now Index

36Pcve.now Index 36 of 100 · methodology v3 · provisional
  • Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
  • Exposure17/25No login or user action needed, reachable over the network without a login · Unknown: Advisories don't say whether default setups are affected
  • Reach10/20Affects npm packages
  • Severity8.7/10CVSS 8.7
  • No patch0/5No signal

What would change the score

  • Would score about 81 if added to CISA KEV
  • Would score about 76 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
  • Would score about 41 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed

Impact

  • Widely used

    @neo4j/graphql has 47.9k weekly downloads.Source: npmjs.com

What to do

  • Upgrade to a fixed version: 5.12.17, 7.6.8.

  • Workaround: Restrict access to aggregate queries over protected data until the upgrade is applied.

Check your systems with an agent

Paste this into a coding or ops agent. It checks your systems read-only and reports a table per asset.

Check whether my systems are affected by CVE-2026-92684 (Aggregation queries can bypass authentication restrictions in @neo4j/graphql), using the cve.now data below.

Rules: work read-only. Do not run exploit code, proof-of-concept scripts or scanners that send attack payloads, and do not change any configuration, package, image or deployment. Report findings only.

What cve.now has for CVE-2026-92684 (entry last updated 2026-11-10):
Affected:
- npm package @neo4j/graphql: from 5.0.0, fixed in 5.12.17; from 7.0.0, fixed in 7.6.8
Fixed versions: 5.12.17, 7.6.8.
Conditions (all must be true for the bug to be hit):
- Applications using field-level @authentication are affected. (source: https://github.com/neo4j/graphql/security/advisories/GHSA-9r8x-hf5g-rh66)
- Affected @neo4j/graphql versions: 5.0.0 to 5.12.16 and 7.0.0 to 7.6.7. (source: https://github.com/neo4j/graphql/security/advisories/GHSA-9r8x-hf5g-rh66)
Setup: unknown whether the bug needs a non-default feature or setting. Check the advisory.
Attacker needs: network access, no login, no user action.
Workaround: Restrict access to aggregate queries over protected data until the upgrade is applied. (source: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-92684)
CISA KEV: CVE-2026-92684 is not listed as of cve.now's last read.
This KEV status is for CVE-2026-92684 only. If you also check another CVE, look up its own KEV status; never assume it from this one.

How to check:
- Packages (npm): find every lockfile in each project and run check_stack from the cve.now MCP server on each one. Compare the resolved versions, not the ranges a manifest declares, with the affected versions above. Include transitive dependencies.

Verify against the linked advisories before concluding, and cite the date you read each one:
- https://github.com/neo4j/graphql/security/advisories/GHSA-9r8x-hf5g-rh66
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-92684
Do not conclude an asset is unaffected unless you checked it and the evidence covers both its version and the conditions above. If you could not check something, mark it unknown and say what is missing.

Report a table with one row per asset and these columns: Asset | Version or build | Status (affected, fixed, not applicable, unknown) | Compensating controls | Exposure (internet-facing, internal, none) | Evidence | Next action.

Entry: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-92684
For follow-up questions, use the cve.now MCP server at https://mcp.cve.now/mcp (no authentication), for example get_vulnerability with id CVE-2026-92684.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now

Affected versions

  • From 5.0.0 · fixed in 5.12.17; From 7.0.0 · fixed in 7.6.8

    Fixed in 5.12.17 (released Nov 10, 2026, the day of disclosure) and 7.6.8 (released Nov 10, 2026, the day of disclosure).

    The latest release, 7.6.8, is not affected.

Evidence 3

Vendor advisory · 1

Establishes: Affected and fixed versions.

  1. Advisory

CVE record · 2

Establishes: The identifier and description.

  1. Record
  2. Record

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

Questions about CVE-2026-92684

Is CVE-2026-92684 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

What does this mean?

Unauthenticated callers can read protected values through aggregation queries, including string aggregates that return stored values verbatim. They can also get aggregate results for entities that require AGGREGATE authentication.Source: github.com, cve.org

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-92684?

@neo4j/graphql (npm): from 5.0.0 before 5.12.17; from 7.0.0 before 7.6.8.Source: cve.now feed data

Am I affected, and how do I check?

Applications using field-level @authentication are affected in @neo4j/graphql 5.0.0 to 5.12.16 and 7.0.0 to 7.6.7. To check, look at the installed @neo4j/graphql version in the package manifest or lockfile, and see whether the schema uses field-level @authentication.Source: github.com, cve.org

How do I fix CVE-2026-92684?

Upgrade @neo4j/graphql to 7.6.8 (latest) or 5.12.17 (LTS). Until the upgrade is applied, restrict access to aggregate queries over protected data.Source: github.com, cve.org