CVE
Eclipse BaSyx Go Components authorization bypass in Submodel Repository list route
Only affects Eclipse BaSyx Go Components up to 1.1.2 with ABAC enabled on the Submodel Repository or AAS Environment and a $sme REFERABLE read grant. Fixed in 1.1.3.
Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.
- Exploited
- No known exploitation
- Fix
- Fixed in 1.1.3
- Who is exposed
- Specific setups only
Do first: Check whether your setup matches what the bug needs. ABAC is enabled on the Submodel Repository or AAS Environment. An access rule grants READ on a single Submodel Element through a $sme REFERABLE object.
- Published
- Last modified
- Whether it needs action now or is a reference record, by fixed rules, with why. Last checked is when cve.now last re-read it.What do these mean? →
- Reference
- Last checked
- A 0-100 score for how much a CVE matters across the industry: exploitation, exposure, how widely the software is used, severity and whether a fix exists.What do these mean? →
- 15/100 · provisional
- How many real-world setups can hit the bug, from the vendor's advisory and CISA data. It does not know your setup.What do these mean? →
- Specific setups only
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
Summary
Eclipse BaSyx Go Components, in ABAC-enabled deployments of the Submodel Repository and AAS Environment, returns Submodel Elements that the caller is not authorized to read through the list route for a Submodel. An attacker with network access and a low-privilege login who holds a READ grant for just one element can read the values of all other elements in that Submodel.
Read the original description
In Eclipse BaSyx Go Components versions up to and including 1.1.2, ABAC-enabled deployments of the Submodel Repository and the AAS Environment return Submodel Elements that the caller is not authorized to read from GET /submodels/{submodelIdentifier}/submodel-elements.
If an access rule grants READ on a single Submodel Element through a $sme REFERABLE object, the list route returns every element of that Submodel, including its value, as soon as one element matches the caller's rules. The single-element route and the full Submodel read enforce the same rule and deny access to the other elements. An authenticated caller with a READ grant for one element of a Submodel can therefore read all other elements of that Submodel.
The issue is fixed in Eclipse BaSyx Go Components v1.1.3.
cve.now Index
- Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
- Exposure8/25Specific setups only, reachable over the network
- Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
- Severity7.1/10CVSS 7.1
- No patch0/5No signal
What would change the score
- Would score about 65 if added to CISA KEV
- Would score about 60 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
- Would score about 22 if CISA's SSVC rates it automatable
What to do
Check whether your setup matches what the bug needs.
ABAC is enabled on the Submodel Repository or AAS Environment. An access rule grants READ on a single Submodel Element through a $sme REFERABLE object.Upgrade to a fixed version: 1.1.3.
Workaround: Avoid $sme REFERABLE grants for callers who must not see the rest of the submodel.
Check your systems with an agent
Paste this into a coding or ops agent. It checks your systems read-only and reports a table per asset.
Check whether my systems are affected by CVE-2026-127102 (In Eclipse BaSyx Go Components versions up to and including 1.1.2, ABAC-enabled deployments of the Submodel Repository and the AAS…), using the cve.now data below.
Rules: work read-only. Do not run exploit code, proof-of-concept scripts or scanners that send attack payloads, and do not change any configuration, package, image or deployment. Report findings only.
What cve.now has for CVE-2026-127102 (entry last updated 2026-11-13):
Affected:
- Eclipse Foundation Eclipse BaSyx Go Components: fixed in 1.1.3
Fixed versions: 1.1.3.
Conditions (all must be true for the bug to be hit):
- ABAC is enabled on the Submodel Repository or AAS Environment. (source: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/work_items/1371)
- An access rule grants READ on a single Submodel Element through a $sme REFERABLE object. (source: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/work_items/1371)
Setup: unknown whether the bug needs a non-default feature or setting. Check the advisory.
Attacker needs: network access, low-privilege login, no user action.
Workaround: Avoid $sme REFERABLE grants for callers who must not see the rest of the submodel. (source: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/work_items/1371)
CISA KEV: CVE-2026-127102 is not listed as of cve.now's last read.
This KEV status is for CVE-2026-127102 only. If you also check another CVE, look up its own KEV status; never assume it from this one.
How to check:
- Installed software: check what is actually running, not what a repo declares. Read the version from each host, container image and Kubernetes node (the binary's version output, the OS package database, image layers), and check whether the conditions above hold there. Distribution packages may carry a backported fix under an older version number; confirm against the distribution's own advisory.
Verify against the linked advisories before concluding, and cite the date you read each one:
- https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/work_items/1371
- https://github.com/eclipse-basyx/basyx-go-components/commit/693e3c72b0dbdaf2c36a1112fde4c77b5d1ead3f
- https://github.com/eclipse-basyx/basyx-go-components/releases/tag/v1.1.3
- https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/cve-assignment/-/work_items/574
Do not conclude an asset is unaffected unless you checked it and the evidence covers both its version and the conditions above. If you could not check something, mark it unknown and say what is missing.
Report a table with one row per asset and these columns: Asset | Version or build | Status (affected, fixed, not applicable, unknown) | Compensating controls | Exposure (internet-facing, internal, none) | Evidence | Next action.
Entry: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-127102
For follow-up questions, use the cve.now MCP server at https://mcp.cve.now/mcp (no authentication), for example execute with name cve.get and arguments {"id": "CVE-2026-127102"}.Timeline
- CVE published
- First seen by cve.now
Affected versions
- Eclipse Foundation Eclipse BaSyx Go Components
fixed in 1.1.3
Evidence 6
Vendor advisory · 2
Establishes: Affected and fixed versions.
- Link
- Link
CVE record · 2
Establishes: The identifier and description.
- Record
- Record
Other links · 2
- Repository
- Repository
Corrections
None so far.
Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.
Questions about CVE-2026-127102
Is CVE-2026-127102 being exploited?
It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data
What does this mean?
A caller with READ permission on a single Submodel Element can read all other elements of that Submodel, including their values, through the submodel element list route. The grant was meant to cover only the one element.Source: gitlab.eclipse.org
Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-127102?
Eclipse BaSyx Go Components: before 1.1.3.Source: cve.now feed data
Am I affected, and how do I check?
Versions up to and including 1.1.2 are affected, and only when ABAC is enabled on the Submodel Repository or AAS Environment and an access rule grants READ on a single Submodel Element through a $sme REFERABLE object. To check, look at the installed Eclipse BaSyx Go Components version and whether ABAC is enabled in the deployment's configuration.Source: gitlab.eclipse.org
How do I fix CVE-2026-127102?
Upgrade Eclipse BaSyx Go Components to version 1.1.3 or later, which contains the fix.Source: gitlab.eclipse.org