Skip to main content
Menu
CVEs

CVE

NocoDB refresh token reuse in non-atomic rotation

Affects NocoDB versions before 2026.08.0, where refresh-token rotation is not atomic, so a captured refresh token can yield a valid session. Fixed in 2026.08.0.

CVE-2026-126280EUVD-2026-125241

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

9.1CriticalCNA
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
Fixed in 2026.08.0
Who is exposed
Not reported

Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 2026.08.0.

Published
Last modified
Reference
Last checked
26/100 · provisional
Unclear
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
On X
View the cve.now post

Summary

NocoDB before 2026.08.0 contains a race condition in refresh-token rotation that allows attackers to reuse tokens because UserRefreshToken.ts never checks the affected-row count. Attackers holding a captured refresh token can present it concurrently with the legitimate user to obtain a valid authenticated session, and no reuse event is recorded.

Who should check

Teams running self-hosted or cloud NocoDB instances older than 2026.08.0 that use refresh-token sessions

Read the source excerpt

“NocoDB before 2026.08.0 contains a race condition”

vulncheck.com

cve.now Index

26Pcve.now Index 26 of 100 · methodology v3 · provisional
  • Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
  • Exposure17/25No login or user action needed, reachable over the network without a login · Unknown: Advisories don't say whether default setups are affected
  • Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
  • Severity9.1/10CVSS 9.1
  • No patch0/5No signal

What would change the score

  • Would score about 71 if added to CISA KEV
  • Would score about 66 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
  • Would score about 31 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed

What to do

  • Upgrade to a fixed version: 2026.08.0.

Check your systems with an agent

Paste this into a coding or ops agent. It checks your systems read-only and reports a table per asset.

Check whether my systems are affected by CVE-2026-126280 (NocoDB before 2026.08.0 Refresh Token Reuse via Non-Atomic Rotation), using the cve.now data below.

Rules: work read-only. Do not run exploit code, proof-of-concept scripts or scanners that send attack payloads, and do not change any configuration, package, image or deployment. Report findings only.

What cve.now has for CVE-2026-126280 (entry last updated 2026-11-13):
Affected:
- nocodb nocodb: fixed in 2026.08.0
Fixed versions: 2026.08.0.
Conditions (all must be true for the bug to be hit):
- NocoDB versions before 2026.08.0 (source: https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nocodb-before-2026.08.0-refresh-token-reuse-via-non-atomic-rotation)
Setup: unknown whether the bug needs a non-default feature or setting. Check the advisory.
Attacker needs: network access, no login, no user action.
CISA KEV: CVE-2026-126280 is not listed as of cve.now's last read.
This KEV status is for CVE-2026-126280 only. If you also check another CVE, look up its own KEV status; never assume it from this one.

How to check:
- Installed software: check what is actually running, not what a repo declares. Read the version from each host, container image and Kubernetes node (the binary's version output, the OS package database, image layers), and check whether the conditions above hold there. Distribution packages may carry a backported fix under an older version number; confirm against the distribution's own advisory.

Verify against the linked advisories before concluding, and cite the date you read each one:
- https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb/security/advisories/GHSA-mh65-9xcf-vf8v
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nocodb-before-2026.08.0-refresh-token-reuse-via-non-atomic-rotation
Do not conclude an asset is unaffected unless you checked it and the evidence covers both its version and the conditions above. If you could not check something, mark it unknown and say what is missing.

Report a table with one row per asset and these columns: Asset | Version or build | Status (affected, fixed, not applicable, unknown) | Compensating controls | Exposure (internet-facing, internal, none) | Evidence | Next action.

Entry: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-126280
For follow-up questions, use the cve.now MCP server at https://mcp.cve.now/mcp (no authentication), for example execute with name cve.get and arguments {"id": "CVE-2026-126280"}.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now
  3. Posted on X by cve.now

Affected versions

  • nocodb nocodb

    fixed in 2026.08.0

Evidence 4

Vendor advisory · 1

Establishes: Affected and fixed versions.

  1. Advisory

CVE record · 2

Establishes: The identifier and description.

  1. Record
  2. Record

Other links · 1

  1. Link

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

Questions about CVE-2026-126280

Is CVE-2026-126280 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

What does this mean?

NocoDB's refresh-token rotation has a race condition, so a captured refresh token can be used to obtain a valid authenticated session as the victim user. No reuse event is recorded when this happens.Source: vulncheck.com, github.com

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-126280?

nocodb: before 2026.08.0.Source: cve.now feed data

Am I affected, and how do I check?

All NocoDB versions before 2026.08.0 are listed as affected. To check a installation, look at the NocoDB version it runs and compare it to 2026.08.0.Source: vulncheck.com, github.com

How do I fix CVE-2026-126280?

Upgrade NocoDB to 2026.08.0 or later, which is the listed fixed version. No vendor patch identifiers or workaround are given in the facts.Source: vulncheck.com, github.com