CVE
NocoDB denial of service in shared view bulk API
Affects NocoDB before 2026.08.1, with the public-API limiter admitting every request on Community Edition deployments. Fixed in 2026.08.1.
Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.
- Exploited
- No known exploitation
- Fix
- Fixed in 2026.08.1
- Who is exposed
- Not reported
Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 2026.08.1.
- Published
- Last modified
- Whether it needs action now or is a reference record, by fixed rules, with why. Last checked is when cve.now last re-read it.What do these mean? →
- Reference
- Last checked
- A 0-100 score for how much a CVE matters across the industry: exploitation, exposure, how widely the software is used, severity and whether a fix exists.What do these mean? →
- 26/100 · provisional
- How many real-world setups can hit the bug, from the vendor's advisory and CISA data. It does not know your setup.What do these mean? →
- Unclear
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
Summary
NocoDB before 2026.08.1 contains an uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resources by sending unbounded filter arrays to shared-view bulk endpoints. Attackers with a shared view UUID can POST a large body of minimal filter objects, triggering a full database query per entry, to crash the NocoDB process.
Who should check
Teams running NocoDB before 2026.08.1 that expose shared views, including Community Edition deployments
Read the source excerpt
“NocoDB before 2026.08.1 contains an uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability”
cve.now Index
- Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
- Exposure17/25No login or user action needed, reachable over the network without a login · Unknown: Advisories don't say whether default setups are affected
- Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
- Severity8.7/10CVSS 8.7
- No patch0/5No signal
What would change the score
- Would score about 71 if added to CISA KEV
- Would score about 66 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
- Would score about 31 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed
What to do
Upgrade to a fixed version: 2026.08.1.
Check your systems with an agent
Paste this into a coding or ops agent. It checks your systems read-only and reports a table per asset.
Check whether my systems are affected by CVE-2026-126277 (NocoDB before 2026.08.1 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption via Shared View Bulk API), using the cve.now data below.
Rules: work read-only. Do not run exploit code, proof-of-concept scripts or scanners that send attack payloads, and do not change any configuration, package, image or deployment. Report findings only.
What cve.now has for CVE-2026-126277 (entry last updated 2026-11-13):
Affected:
- nocodb nocodb: fixed in 2026.08.1
Fixed versions: 2026.08.1.
Conditions (all must be true for the bug to be hit):
- Running NocoDB before 2026.08.1 (source: https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nocodb-before-2026.08.1-uncontrolled-resource-consumption-via-shared-view-bulk-api)
- Attacker must know the UUID of a shared view (source: https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nocodb-before-2026.08.1-uncontrolled-resource-consumption-via-shared-view-bulk-api)
- Community Edition deployments, where the public-API limiter guard admits every request (source: https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb/security/advisories/GHSA-2j2m-jqcx-2q2j)
Setup: unknown whether the bug needs a non-default feature or setting. Check the advisory.
Attacker needs: network access, no login, no user action.
CISA KEV: CVE-2026-126277 is not listed as of cve.now's last read.
This KEV status is for CVE-2026-126277 only. If you also check another CVE, look up its own KEV status; never assume it from this one.
How to check:
- Installed software: check what is actually running, not what a repo declares. Read the version from each host, container image and Kubernetes node (the binary's version output, the OS package database, image layers), and check whether the conditions above hold there. Distribution packages may carry a backported fix under an older version number; confirm against the distribution's own advisory.
Verify against the linked advisories before concluding, and cite the date you read each one:
- https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb/security/advisories/GHSA-2j2m-jqcx-2q2j
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nocodb-before-2026.08.1-uncontrolled-resource-consumption-via-shared-view-bulk-api
Do not conclude an asset is unaffected unless you checked it and the evidence covers both its version and the conditions above. If you could not check something, mark it unknown and say what is missing.
Report a table with one row per asset and these columns: Asset | Version or build | Status (affected, fixed, not applicable, unknown) | Compensating controls | Exposure (internet-facing, internal, none) | Evidence | Next action.
Entry: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-126277
For follow-up questions, use the cve.now MCP server at https://mcp.cve.now/mcp (no authentication), for example execute with name cve.get and arguments {"id": "CVE-2026-126277"}.Timeline
- CVE published
- First seen by cve.now
Affected versions
- nocodb nocodb
fixed in 2026.08.1
Evidence 4
Vendor advisory · 1
Establishes: Affected and fixed versions.
- Advisory
CVE record · 2
Establishes: The identifier and description.
- Record
- Record
Corrections
None so far.
Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.
Questions about CVE-2026-126277
Is CVE-2026-126277 being exploited?
It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data
What does this mean?
A single POST request with a large body of minimal filter objects to a shared view's bulk API can exhaust the server's CPU and memory and crash the NocoDB process. The request needs the UUID of a shared view.Source: vulncheck.com, github.com
Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-126277?
nocodb: before 2026.08.1.Source: cve.now feed data
Am I affected, and how do I check?
NocoDB versions before 2026.08.1 are affected. The advisory names Community Edition deployments, where the public-API limiter guard on these routes admits every request, and the attack requires knowing a shared view's UUID. Check your version in the NocoDB instance's settings or release information and compare it with 2026.08.1.Source: vulncheck.com, github.com
How do I fix CVE-2026-126277?
Upgrade NocoDB to 2026.08.1 or later, which is the fixed version.Source: vulncheck.com, github.com