Arbitrary file write and code execution via excluded node roles in Kubernetes special agent
Affects the Checkmk Kubernetes special agent using the 'Exclude nodes based on their role' rule option in 2.4.0 before 2.4.0p40 and 2.5.0 before 2.5.0p19. Fixed in those patch releases.
Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.
- Exploited
- No known exploitation
- Fix
- Fixed in 2.5.0p19, 2.4.0p40
- Who is exposed
- Specific setups only
Do first: Check whether your setup matches what the bug needs. Kubernetes special agent using the 'Exclude nodes based on their role' rule option with crafted node roles
- Published
- Last modified
- Whether it needs action now or is a reference record, by fixed rules, with why. Last checked is when cve.now last re-read it.What do these mean? →
- Reference
- Last checked
- A 0-100 score for how much a CVE matters across the industry: exploitation, exposure, how widely the software is used, severity and whether a fix exists.What do these mean? →
- 17/100 · provisional
- How many real-world setups can hit the bug, from the vendor's advisory and CISA data. It does not know your setup.What do these mean? →
- Specific setups only
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
Summary
Checkmk from Checkmk GmbH has an argument injection flaw in its Kubernetes special agent. A logged-in user who can edit rules in at least one folder can supply crafted node roles in the "Exclude nodes based on their role" rule option, which lets them write files to any location the site user can write to. Reachable over the network with low-privilege login, this can lead to code execution as the site user.
Read the original description
Argument injection in the Kubernetes special agent in Checkmk <2.5.0p19, <2.4.0p40, and 2.3.0 (EOL) allows a user with permission to edit rules in at least one folder to write files to arbitrary locations writable by the site user via crafted node roles in the "Exclude nodes based on their role" rule option, leading to code execution as the site user.
Who should check
Teams running Checkmk 2.5.0, 2.4.0 or 2.3.0 (EOL) where users can edit monitoring rules, since all sites are affected
cve.now Index
- Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
- Exposure8/25Specific setups only, reachable over the network
- Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
- Severity9.4/10CVSS 9.4
- No patch0/5No signal
What would change the score
- Would score about 67 if added to CISA KEV
- Would score about 62 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
- Would score about 24 if CISA's SSVC rates it automatable
What to do
Check whether your setup matches what the bug needs.
Kubernetes special agent using the 'Exclude nodes based on their role' rule option with crafted node rolesUpgrade to a fixed version: 2.5.0p19, 2.4.0p40.
Check your systems with an agent
Paste this into a coding or ops agent. It checks your systems read-only and reports a table per asset.
Check whether my systems are affected by CVE-2026-121374 (Arbitrary file write and code execution via excluded node roles in Kubernetes special agent), using the cve.now data below. Rules: work read-only. Do not run exploit code, proof-of-concept scripts or scanners that send attack payloads, and do not change any configuration, package, image or deployment. Report findings only. What cve.now has for CVE-2026-121374 (entry last updated 2026-11-11): Affected: - Checkmk GmbH Checkmk: from 2.5.0, fixed in 2.5.0p19; from 2.4.0, fixed in 2.4.0p40 Fixed versions: 2.5.0p19, 2.4.0p40. Conditions (all must be true for the bug to be hit): - Kubernetes special agent using the 'Exclude nodes based on their role' rule option with crafted node roles (source: https://checkmk.com/werk/17994) Setup: the bug is reachable in a default setup; no special feature or setting is needed. Attacker needs: network access, low-privilege login, no user action. CISA KEV: CVE-2026-121374 is not listed as of cve.now's last read. This KEV status is for CVE-2026-121374 only. If you also check another CVE, look up its own KEV status; never assume it from this one. How to check: - Installed software: check what is actually running, not what a repo declares. Read the version from each host, container image and Kubernetes node (the binary's version output, the OS package database, image layers), and check whether the conditions above hold there. Distribution packages may carry a backported fix under an older version number; confirm against the distribution's own advisory. Verify against the linked advisories before concluding, and cite the date you read each one: - https://checkmk.com/werk/17994 - https://checkmk.com/werk/22120 Do not conclude an asset is unaffected unless you checked it and the evidence covers both its version and the conditions above. If you could not check something, mark it unknown and say what is missing. Report a table with one row per asset and these columns: Asset | Version or build | Status (affected, fixed, not applicable, unknown) | Compensating controls | Exposure (internet-facing, internal, none) | Evidence | Next action. Entry: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-121374 For follow-up questions, use the cve.now MCP server at https://mcp.cve.now/mcp (no authentication), for example get_vulnerability with id CVE-2026-121374.
Timeline
- CVE published
- Record last updated
- First seen by cve.now
- Posted on X by cve.now
Affected versions
- Checkmk GmbH Checkmk
From 2.5.0 · fixed in 2.5.0p19; From 2.4.0 · fixed in 2.4.0p40
Evidence 4
Vendor advisory · 2
Establishes: Affected and fixed versions.
- Advisory
- Advisory
CVE record · 2
Establishes: The identifier and description.
- Record
- Record
Corrections
None so far.
Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.
Questions about CVE-2026-121374
Is CVE-2026-121374 being exploited?
It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data
What does this mean?
The Kubernetes special agent passed node roles from the 'Exclude nodes based on their role' rule option without safe handling, so crafted role values could write files to any location writable by the site user. A written file could be an executable Python script with attacker-controlled content, which leads to code execution as the site user.Source: checkmk.com
Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-121374?
Checkmk: from 2.5.0 before 2.5.0p19; from 2.4.0 before 2.4.0p40.Source: cve.now feed data
Am I affected, and how do I check?
Checkmk 2.4.0 before 2.4.0p40 and 2.5.0 before 2.5.0p19 are affected when the Kubernetes special agent uses the 'Exclude nodes based on their role' rule option. Check the installed version with the Checkmk version display and review the Kubernetes special agent rule settings.Source: checkmk.com
How do I fix CVE-2026-121374?
Upgrade to 2.4.0p40 or 2.5.0p19, or to a later release in the same branch. The checked facts do not list a workaround.Source: checkmk.com