- Exploited
- No known exploitation
- Fix
- Fixed in 10.0.14
- Who is exposed
- Not reported
Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 10.0.14.
- Last modified
- A 0-100 score for how much a CVE matters across the industry: exploitation, exposure, how widely the software is used, severity and whether a fix exists.What do these mean? →
- 17/100 · provisional
- The rating the maker of the software gives it. Shown when it differs from the CVSS level.What do these mean? →
- High (ghsa)
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
Summary
SIPSorcery can be driven into a denial of service by a crafted SCTP SACK chunk. The malformed chunk makes the SCTP receive thread exit, which permanently kills the SCTP association and all of its data channels.
Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.
Read the original description
SctpSackChunk.ParseChunk reads the numGapAckBlocks and numDuplicateTSNs fields (each up to 65535) directly from an attacker-controlled SCTP SACK chunk and loops that many times reading 4 bytes per iteration, with no validation of the counts against the chunk length or the receive buffer. A single crafted SACK chunk from a negotiated WebRTC peer forces reads past the end of the 262144-byte receive buffer, raising IndexOutOfRangeException, which is not caught by the recoverable handler and terminates the dedicated SCTP receive thread — permanently killing the SCTP association and all data channels.
Root Cause
src/SIPSorcery/net/SCTP/Chunks/SctpSackChunk.cs:
ushort numGapAckBlocks = NetConvert.ParseUInt16(buffer, startPosn + 8);(:141)ushort numDuplicateTSNs = NetConvert.ParseUInt16(buffer, startPosn + 10);(:142)- gap-ack loop (:146) and duplicate-TSN loop (:154) index the buffer via
NetConvert.ParseUInt16/32(buffer[posn], no bounds check —sys/Net/NetConvert.cs:30,41).
SctpPacket.ParseChunks (SctpPacket.cs:195-203) only validates chunkLength >= 4 and posn+chunkLength <= length; the counts inside the value are never checked. RTCSctpTransport.DoReceive calls SctpPacket.Parse(recvBuffer, 0, bytesRead) on a reused recvBuffer = new byte[262144].
Impact
IndexOutOfRangeException is a SystemException, not ApplicationException, so the recoverable catch (ApplicationException) { … continue; } at RTCSctpTransport.cs:345 is skipped and control falls to the generic catch (Exception) { … break; } at :356. The break exits the receive loop, DoReceive returns, and the dedicated _receiveThread = new Thread(DoReceive) (:173, started once) exits with no restart → the SCTP association and every data channel are permanently dead (denial of service).
Proof of Concept
A negotiated WebRTC peer (post-DTLS) sends a checksum-valid SCTP packet: 12-byte common header + a SACK chunk (type 3) with chunkLength=16, numGapAckBlocks=0xFFFF, numDuplicateTSNs=0xFFFF. CRC32C is attacker-computable. The gap-ack loop reaches buffer[262144] on a 262144-byte array (valid indices 0..262143) → IndexOutOfRangeException.
Attack Chain
- Entry: post-DTLS negotiated peer sends a checksum-valid SCTP packet with a SACK chunk (
chunkLength=16,numGapAckBlocks=0xFFFF). Guard:VerifyChecksum(CRC32C). Bypass: CRC32C is computable by the sender. - Processing:
DoReceive(RTCSctpTransport.cs:286) reads into reusedrecvBuffer(262144 bytes, :280) →SctpPacket.Parse(recvBuffer, 0, bytesRead)(:302) →ParseChunks→ SACK dispatch (SctpChunk.Parse:340-341) →SctpSackChunk.ParseChunk. Guard:ParseChunkschecks onlychunkLength>=4andposn+chunkLength<=length(SctpPacket.cs:195-203). Bypass:chunkLength=16is well-formed; the counts are never validated. - Sink: gap-ack loop (SctpSackChunk.cs:146) calls
NetConvert.ParseUInt16(buffer, reportPosn)withreportPosnstarting atstartPosn(16)+FIXED_PARAMETERS(12)=28, climbing+4each iteration. Guard: none on the count. Bypass:NetConvert.ParseUInt16(NetConvert.cs:30) indexesbuffer[posn]unchecked. - Impact: at iteration 65529,
reportPosn = 28 + 65529*4 = 262144→buffer[262144]→IndexOutOfRangeException→ genericcatchat RTCSctpTransport.cs:356 →break→ receive thread exits, no restart → association permanently dead.
Bypass Evidence
- Unchecked counts at SctpSackChunk.cs:141-142; loops at :146,:154.
NetConvert.ParseUInt16unchecked indexing (NetConvert.cs:30).ParseChunksvalidates onlychunkLength(SctpPacket.cs:195-203).- OOB math:
28 + 65535*4 = 262168 > 262144; buffer is 262144 (DEFAULT_ADVERTISED_RECEIVE_WINDOW, SctpAssociation.cs:62).numGapAckBlocksalone suffices — the dup-TSN loop is not needed. DoReceivecatch split: recoverablecatch(ApplicationException)at :345 (continue) vs genericcatch(Exception)at :356 (break);_receiveThreadstarted once at :176.
Affected Versions
nuget:SIPSorcery <= 10.0.13 (verified present on release tag v10.0.13 and HEAD da944543).
Dedup
NOT a duplicate of GHSA-qmvg-569h-hqrh — that fix (fe5a1fa) touched only SctpPacket.cs (the chunk-cursor zero-length infinite loop, CWE-835). This is a distinct out-of-bounds read (CWE-125) in SctpSackChunk count loops, untouched by that fix.
Suggested Fix
Validate startPosn + FIXED_PARAMETERS_LENGTH + numGapAckBlocks*4 + numDuplicateTSNs*4 <= posn + chunkLen before the loops, and/or make NetConvert.Parse* bounds-checked, and/or treat IndexOutOfRangeException/ArgumentException as recoverable in DoReceive.
--- Reported by zx (Jace) — GitHub: @manus-use
cve.now Index
- Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
- Exposure?/25Unknown. No advisory context yet
- Reach10/20Affects NuGet packages
- Severity7/10Rated high by ghsa
- No patch0/5No signal
What would change the score
- Would score about 72 if added to CISA KEV
- Would score about 67 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
- Would score about 39 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed
What to do
Upgrade to a fixed version: 10.0.14.
Timeline
- Advisory published
- Record last updated
Affected versions
- SIPSorceryNuGet
fixed in 10.0.14
Fixed in 10.0.14 (released Aug 10, 2026, 2 days before disclosure).
The latest release, 10.0.17, is not affected.
Evidence 3
- Advisory
- Repository
- Repository
Corrections
None so far.
Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.
Questions about GHSA-JWJP-4649-V8JP
Is GHSA-JWJP-4649-V8JP being exploited?
It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data
Which versions are affected by GHSA-JWJP-4649-V8JP?
SIPSorcery (NuGet): before 10.0.14.Source: cve.now feed data
How do I fix GHSA-JWJP-4649-V8JP?
Upgrade to a fixed version: 10.0.14.Source: cve.now feed data