In Kura versions <= 5.6.2, `CommandCloudApp.execute()` extracts a caller-supplied ZIP archive into a caller-supplied directory inside the…
Affects Eclipse Kura 0.7.0 through 5.6.2 on packaged installations where the JVM runs as kurad with CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE and the command service is enabled. No fix is listed in the checked facts.
Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.
- Exploited
- No known exploitation
- Fix
- No fix listed
- Who is exposed
- Specific setups only
Do first: Check whether your setup matches what the bug needs. Kura versions <= 5.6.2 Packaged Kura installation where the JVM runs as kurad with CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE Command service enabled
- Last modified
- Whether it needs action now or is a reference record, by fixed rules, with why. Last checked is when cve.now last re-read it.What do these mean? →
- Reference
- Last checked
- A 0-100 score for how much a CVE matters across the industry: exploitation, exposure, how widely the software is used, severity and whether a fix exists.What do these mean? →
- 20/100 · provisional
- How many real-world setups can hit the bug, from the vendor's advisory and CISA data. It does not know your setup.What do these mean? →
- Specific setups only
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
Summary
Kura contains a flaw that lets an attacker who can reach it over the network and log in with low privileges write or overwrite arbitrary files on the device as the `kurad` user. This bypasses the unprivileged command sandbox that the operator selected.
Read the original description
In Kura versions <= 5.6.2, CommandCloudApp.execute() extracts a caller-supplied ZIP archive into a caller-supplied directory inside the Kura JVM process before dispatching the command to the executor service. On a packaged Kura installation the JVM runs as kurad with CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE, while the configurable "Unprivileged" executor drops to the kura user via su.
A caller with permissions rest.command who is intentionally restricted to unprivileged command execution (privileged.command.service.enable=false, the default) can therefore set workingDirectory to / and use the ZIP body to write or overwrite arbitrary files on the device as kurad, completely bypassing the unprivileged sandbox the operator selected.
The command service is disabled by default since Kura 4.0.0 [1]. The issue does not apply when the command service is disabled.
[1] https://github.com/eclipse-kura/kura/blob/f9f969231892769a269876b23f19fa0e8173e3df/kura/distrib/RELEASE_NOTES.txt#L94
cve.now Index
- Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
- Exposure8/25Specific setups only, reachable over the network
- Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
- Severity7.4/10CVSS 7.4
- No patch5/5No patch listed yet
What would change the score
- Would score about 70 if added to CISA KEV
- Would score about 65 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
- Would score about 27 if CISA's SSVC rates it automatable
What to do
Check whether your setup matches what the bug needs.
Kura versions <= 5.6.2 Packaged Kura installation where the JVM runs as kurad with CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE Command service enabledWorkaround: The checked facts give no workaround. They state the issue does not apply when the command service is disabled, so disabling that service is the limiting step the facts describe.
Check your systems with an agent
Paste this into a coding or ops agent. It checks your systems read-only and reports a table per asset.
Check whether my systems are affected by CVE-2026-97401 (In Kura versions <= 5.6.2, `CommandCloudApp.execute()` extracts a caller-supplied ZIP archive into a caller-supplied directory inside the…), using the cve.now data below. Rules: work read-only. Do not run exploit code, proof-of-concept scripts or scanners that send attack payloads, and do not change any configuration, package, image or deployment. Report findings only. What cve.now has for CVE-2026-97401 (entry last updated 2026-11-10): Affected: - Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Kura: from 0.7.0, through 5.6.2 Fixed versions: none listed yet. Conditions (all must be true for the bug to be hit): - Kura versions <= 5.6.2 (source: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/cve-assignment/-/work_items/323) - Packaged Kura installation where the JVM runs as kurad with CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE (source: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/cve-assignment/-/work_items/323) - Command service enabled (source: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/cve-assignment/-/work_items/323) Setup: the bug needs a feature or setting that is off by default or uncommon. Check whether each asset has it on. Attacker needs: network access, low-privilege login, no user action. CISA KEV: CVE-2026-97401 is not listed as of cve.now's last read. This KEV status is for CVE-2026-97401 only. If you also check another CVE, look up its own KEV status; never assume it from this one. How to check: - Installed software: check what is actually running, not what a repo declares. Read the version from each host, container image and Kubernetes node (the binary's version output, the OS package database, image layers), and check whether the conditions above hold there. Distribution packages may carry a backported fix under an older version number; confirm against the distribution's own advisory. Verify against the linked advisories before concluding, and cite the date you read each one: - https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/work_items/922 - https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/cve-assignment/-/work_items/323 Do not conclude an asset is unaffected unless you checked it and the evidence covers both its version and the conditions above. If you could not check something, mark it unknown and say what is missing. Report a table with one row per asset and these columns: Asset | Version or build | Status (affected, fixed, not applicable, unknown) | Compensating controls | Exposure (internet-facing, internal, none) | Evidence | Next action. Entry: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-97401 For follow-up questions, use the cve.now MCP server at https://mcp.cve.now/mcp (no authentication), for example get_vulnerability with id CVE-2026-97401.
Timeline
- CVE published
- First seen by cve.now
Affected versions
- Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Kura
From 0.7.0 · through 5.6.2
Evidence 4
Vendor advisory · 2
Establishes: Affected and fixed versions.
- Link
- Link
CVE record · 2
Establishes: The identifier and description.
- Record
- Record
Corrections
None so far.
Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.
Questions about CVE-2026-97401
Is CVE-2026-97401 being exploited?
It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data
What does this mean?
CommandCloudApp.execute() extracts a caller-supplied ZIP archive into a caller-supplied directory. A crafted archive can write or overwrite arbitrary files on the device as the kurad user, bypassing the unprivileged executor sandbox.Source: gitlab.eclipse.org
Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-97401?
Eclipse Kura: from 0.7.0 through 5.6.2.Source: cve.now feed data
Am I affected, and how do I check?
Eclipse Kura versions 0.7.0 through 5.6.2 are in range. The issue applies on a packaged Kura installation where the JVM runs as kurad with CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE, and only when the command service is enabled. The checked facts do not name a specific setting or command for checking these conditions.Source: gitlab.eclipse.org
How do I fix CVE-2026-97401?
The checked facts do not name a fixed release, so no upgrade target is stated. Confirm the fixed version in the Eclipse Kura advisory before relying on any specific release.Source: gitlab.eclipse.org
What if there's no patch?
The checked facts give no workaround. They state the issue does not apply when the command service is disabled, so disabling that service is the limiting step the facts describe.Source: gitlab.eclipse.org