Skip to main content
← Vulnerabilities

Keycloak-services: keycloak-services: unverified idp email auto-linking enables account takeover

Affects Red Hat Build of Keycloak and Red Hat Single Sign-On 7 setups that automatically link brokered identity providers to local accounts by email. No fix is listed yet.

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

8.8HighCNA
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
No fix listed
Who is exposed
Specific setups only

Do first: Check whether your setup matches what the bug needs. Keycloak automatically links an incoming identity from an external (brokered) provider to an existing local account based on email, without verifying that the provider validated the email.

Published
Last modified
32/100 · provisional
Specific setups only
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub

Summary

The Keycloak-services component's idp-auto-link authenticator can be abused to take over a victim's local account. Remotely, an attacker with a low-privilege login at a brokered identity provider can gain full control of an account whose email matches an unverified address at that provider, because Keycloak links the identities without checking that the email was validated.

Read the original description

A flaw was found in the idp-auto-link authenticator of the keycloak-services component, which handles user identity federation. The issue occurs when Keycloak automatically links an incoming identity from an external provider to an existing local account based on an email address without verifying if the provider has validated that email. This can allow an attacker to take over a victim's account by using a matching unverified email address at a brokered provider.

cve.now Index

32Pcve.now Index 32 of 100 · methodology v3 · provisional
  • Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
  • Exposure8/25Specific setups only, reachable over the network
  • Reach10/20Shipped in major Linux distributions
  • Severity8.8/10CVSS 8.8
  • No patch5/5No patch listed yet

What would change the score

  • Would score about 82 if added to CISA KEV
  • Would score about 77 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
  • Would score about 39 if CISA's SSVC rates it automatable

What to do

  • Check whether your setup matches what the bug needs.

    Keycloak automatically links an incoming identity from an external (brokered) provider to an existing local account based on email, without verifying that the provider validated the email.
  • Workaround: The checked facts do not list a workaround. Until a fix is available, follow the guidance in Red Hat's advisory for limiting this behavior.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now

Affected versions

  • keycloak-services

    Version range not reported

  • rhbk/keycloak-rhel9

    Version range not reported

  • keycloak-services

    Version range not reported

Evidence 1

  1. Link

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

Questions about CVE-2026-97175

Is CVE-2026-97175 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

What does this mean?

Keycloak links an identity from an external identity provider to an existing local account by matching email, without checking that the provider verified that email. Someone who controls such an external identity can take over the local account, including changing its email and password.Source: access.redhat.com

Am I affected, and how do I check?

The checked facts list Red Hat Build of Keycloak and Red Hat Single Sign-On 7 without version ranges. The relevant setup is one where an external identity provider is brokered and incoming identities are auto-linked to local accounts by email. Check your Keycloak version and identity provider linking settings against Red Hat's advisory.Source: access.redhat.com

How do I fix CVE-2026-97175?

The checked facts do not name a fixed release, so no upgrade target can be given from them. Check Red Hat's advisory for the patched version of your product line and upgrade to it.Source: access.redhat.com

What if there's no patch?

The checked facts do not list a workaround. Until a fix is available, follow the guidance in Red Hat's advisory for limiting this behavior.Source: access.redhat.com