- Exploited
- No known exploitation
- Fix
- Fixed in 4.1.1, 4.0.4, 3.5.10
- Who is exposed
- Not reported
Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 4.1.1, 4.0.4, 3.5.10.
- Last modified
- Whether it needs action now or is a reference record, by fixed rules, with why. Last checked is when cve.now last re-read it.What do these mean? →
- Reference
- Last checked
- A 0-100 score for how much a CVE matters across the industry: exploitation, exposure, how widely the software is used, severity and whether a fix exists.What do these mean? →
- 21/100 · provisional
- The rating the maker of the software gives it. Shown when it differs from the CVSS level.What do these mean? →
- Low (openssl)
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
Summary
Issue summary: QUIC, when performing automated peer detection, may allow uninitialized stack data to leak into the received address which is then used as the destination for outgoing packets.
Impact summary: Applications using QUIC's automated peer detection mechanism may receive an invalid address, leading to connection loss and disclosure of uninitialized stack data to an attacker observing the outgoing network traffic.
CWE: CWE-457 (Use of Uninitialized Variable)
Show the full description
Description: The OpenSSL QUIC stack contains a feature in which, when using an already connected socket, it will auto-detect the peer address during the SSL handshake. This feature uses the getpeername() function, passing a buffer of sufficient length to hold any supported address family, but passes a buffer length that is only sized such that larger addresses, such as IPv6, cannot be retrieved. The getpeername() function however, still returns the full address length, which is accepted as the valid input buffer length, leading to the address buffer containing uninitialized stack data instead of the actual peer address. The invalid peer address is then used as destination for the outgoing packets which leads to a connectivity breakage and a leakage of the uninitialized stack data to passive network observers.
FIPS impact: no The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, and 3.0 are not affected by this CVE as the affected protocol is not implemented in the FIPS module.
cve.now Index
- Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
- Exposure?/25Unknown. No advisory context yet
- Reach20/20Affects OpenSSL (software on nearly every server, desktop or phone)
- Severity1/10Rated low by openssl
- No patch0/5No signal
What would change the score
- Would score about 76 if added to CISA KEV
- Would score about 71 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
- Would score about 43 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed
What to do
Upgrade to a fixed version: 4.1.1, 4.0.4, 3.5.10.
Check your systems with an agent
Paste this into a coding or ops agent. It checks your systems read-only and reports a table per asset.
Check whether my systems are affected by CVE-2026-88822 (QUIC Uses Uninitialized Stack Bytes During Automated Peer Detection), using the cve.now data below. Rules: work read-only. Do not run exploit code, proof-of-concept scripts or scanners that send attack payloads, and do not change any configuration, package, image or deployment. Report findings only. What cve.now has for CVE-2026-88822 (entry last updated 2026-11-10): Affected: - OpenSSL OpenSSL: from 4.1.0, fixed in 4.1.1; from 4.0.0, fixed in 4.0.4; from 3.5.0, fixed in 3.5.10 Fixed versions: 4.1.1, 4.0.4, 3.5.10. Setup: unknown whether the bug needs a non-default feature or setting. Check the advisory. CISA KEV: CVE-2026-88822 is not listed as of cve.now's last read. This KEV status is for CVE-2026-88822 only. If you also check another CVE, look up its own KEV status; never assume it from this one. How to check: - Installed software: check what is actually running, not what a repo declares. Read the version from each host, container image and Kubernetes node (the binary's version output, the OS package database, image layers), and check whether the conditions above hold there. Distribution packages may carry a backported fix under an older version number; confirm against the distribution's own advisory. Verify against the linked advisories before concluding, and cite the date you read each one: - https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20261110.txt - https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7b4f5344aa0401e7b777640050b5257ed2a70e88 - https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/911eee8eb7550b95a206f1ad8cbdb986098982f3 - https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/1a73dc590cbad62d6f0329ea4779eadaa8d8fd75 Do not conclude an asset is unaffected unless you checked it and the evidence covers both its version and the conditions above. If you could not check something, mark it unknown and say what is missing. Report a table with one row per asset and these columns: Asset | Version or build | Status (affected, fixed, not applicable, unknown) | Compensating controls | Exposure (internet-facing, internal, none) | Evidence | Next action. Entry: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-88822 For follow-up questions, use the cve.now MCP server at https://mcp.cve.now/mcp (no authentication), for example get_vulnerability with id CVE-2026-88822.
Timeline
- CVE published
- First seen by cve.now
Affected versions
- OpenSSL OpenSSL
From 4.1.0 · fixed in 4.1.1; From 4.0.0 · fixed in 4.0.4; From 3.5.0 · fixed in 3.5.10
Evidence 6
CVE record · 2
Establishes: The identifier and description.
- Record
- Record
Corrections
None so far.
Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.
Questions about CVE-2026-88822
Is CVE-2026-88822 being exploited?
It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data
Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-88822?
OpenSSL: from 4.1.0 before 4.1.1; from 4.0.0 before 4.0.4; from 3.5.0 before 3.5.10.Source: cve.now feed data
How do I fix CVE-2026-88822?
Upgrade to a fixed version: 4.1.1, 4.0.4, 3.5.10.Source: cve.now feed data