Skip to main content
← All vulnerabilities
CVE-2026-86415

auto client cert connection reuse mixup

Only affects curl 8.21.0 through 8.22.0 built with the Schannel TLS backend on Windows. curl rates it Low, below its CVSS score. Fixed in 8.23.0.

Published
Last modified
published
Not listed in CISA KEV
Unclear
Low (curl)
Fix
Fixed in 8.23.0
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
  • Exploitation: none
  • Automatable: yes
  • Technical impact: partial

Summary

libcurl's connection cache match function never considers the automatic client certificate option, so a cached, already authenticated Schannel connection can be handed to a transfer that got redirected to a different origin, even though the code explicitly switched off the auto client cert option for that transfer to prevent exactly this.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. CISA SSVC assessment

    Exploitation: none · Automatable: yes · Technical impact: partial

  3. Record last updated

Affected versions

  • curl curl

    From 8.22.0 · through 8.22.0; From 8.21.0 · through 8.21.0

References 3

curl.se

hackerone.com

FAQ

Questions about CVE-2026-86415

What does this mean?

A cached connection that is already authenticated can be reused for a redirected transfer to a different origin. This can leak data that was sent over the connection (CWE-201, Information Exposure Through Sent Data).Source: curl.se, curl.se

Am I affected, and how do I check?

Affects curl 8.21.0 through 8.22.0 only when built with Schannel as the TLS backend, which is available only on Windows. To check a installation, run curl --version and look at the TLS backend it reports.Source: curl.se, curl.se

What should I do about it?

Upgrade to curl 8.23.0, which contains the fix. If an upgrade is not possible, the advisory's workaround is to build curl with a different TLS backend.Source: curl.se, curl.se

Is it being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

Why is it rated 7.5 High?

CVSS scores the flaw 7.5 (high) by assuming the worst case. curl rates it Low because the affected setup is narrow: only Schannel builds on Windows are affected.Source: curl.se, curl.se