Skip to main content
← Vulnerabilities

NUT blazer_usb ippon_command stack info-leak via unzeroed char tmp[64] in OUT-direction usb_control_msg

2.4LowCNA
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
No fix listed
Who is exposed
Not reported
Published
Last modified
7/100 · provisional
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub

Summary

Network UPS Tools (NUT) is affected through its blazer_usb driver, which can send uninitialized stack memory to a malicious USB device posing as a Mustek Powermust UPS during normal polling. An attacker with physical access to the USB connection or a place in the device supply chain can exploit this without logging in or any user action, but can only read a small, bounded amount of memory.

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

Read the original description

Network UPS Tools is a collection of programs which provide a common interface for monitoring and administering UPS, PDU and SCD hardware. From 2.4.2 through 2.8.5, ippon_command in drivers/blazer_usb.c partially initializes char tmp[64] with a short Megatec status query and then passes a fixed eight-byte chunk to usb_control_msg. A malicious firmware-controlled USB device presenting the Mustek Powermust VID 0x06da and Mustek Powermust PID 0x0003 matches blazer_usb_id, selects ippon_subdriver, and can receive the uninitialized trailing stack bytes during normal polling. The disclosure is bounded and read-only, requires physical or supply-chain access to the USB bus, and has no established integrity or availability impact. This issue is scheduled to be fixed in version 2.8.6.

cve.now Index

7Pcve.now Index 7 of 100 · methodology v3 · provisional
  • Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
  • Exposure?/25Unknown. No advisory context yet
  • Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
  • Severity2.4/10CVSS 2.4
  • No patch5/5No patch listed yet

What would change the score

  • Would score about 62 if added to CISA KEV
  • Would score about 57 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
  • Would score about 29 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now

Affected versions

  • networkupstools nut

    From 2.4.2 · through 2.8.5

Evidence 3

  1. Advisory
  2. Repository
  3. Repository

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

Questions about CVE-2026-85068

Is CVE-2026-85068 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-85068?

nut: from 2.4.2 through 2.8.5.Source: cve.now feed data