IBM Guardium Data Protection is affected by multiple vulnerabilities
- Exploited
- No known exploitation
- Fix
- Fix or patch referenced
- Who is exposed
- Not reported
Do first: Apply the patch listed under Evidence.
- Last modified
- A 0-100 score for how much a CVE matters across the industry: exploitation, exposure, how widely the software is used, severity and whether a fix exists.What do these mean? →
- 6/100 · provisional
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
Summary
IBM Guardium Data Protection is affected by a flaw that lets a remote attacker with low-privilege login read sensitive information by getting around a restriction on file paths. The attacker reaches it over the network, and it does not require any action from a user.
Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.
Read the original description
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.4 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory.
cve.now Index
- Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
- Exposure3/25Reachable over the network · Unknown: No advisory context yet
- Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
- Severity3.1/10CVSS 3.1
- No patch0/5No signal
What would change the score
- Would score about 61 if added to CISA KEV
- Would score about 56 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
- Would score about 25 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed
What to do
Apply the patch listed under Evidence.
Timeline
- CVE published
- First seen by cve.now
Affected versions
- IBM Guardium Data Protection
12.2.4
Evidence 1
- Patch
Corrections
None so far.
Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.
Questions about CVE-2026-84237
Is CVE-2026-84237 being exploited?
It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data
Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-84237?
Guardium Data Protection: version 12.2.4.Source: cve.now feed data