Skip to main content
← All vulnerabilities
CVE-2026-82819

Universal Naming Convention (UNC) Path Injection in Cerberus FTP Server

Cerberus FTP Server before 2026.3.0 is exposed when its web-based client is enabled for external authenticated users and a UNC path is supplied via relPath with cd left empty. Fixed in 2026.3.0.

Published
Last modified
published
Not listed in CISA KEV
Specific setups only
Fix
Fixed in 2026.3.0
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
  • Exploitation: poc
  • Automatable: no
  • Technical impact: partial

Summary

A vulnerability in Cerberus FTP Server allows an authenticated remote attacker to perform UNC path injection via a manipulated parameter. By supplying a malicious SMB share path, an attacker can execute authentication coercion against the underlying server, resulting in the leakage of the Cerberus service account's Net-NTLMv2 hash. This issue has been resolved in Cerberus FTP Server: 2026.3.0.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. CISA SSVC assessment

    Exploitation: poc · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial

  3. Record last updated

Affected versions

  • Cerberus Cerberus FTP Server

    fixed in 2026.3.0

References 2

cerberusftp.com

labs.reversec.com

FAQ

Questions about CVE-2026-82819

What does this mean?

When a UNC path is supplied through the relPath parameter while cd is empty, the server leaks authentication material tied to its configured service account. That material is Net-NTLMv2, which can be captured and cracked offline or used in NTLM relay attacks.Source: labs.reversec.com

Am I affected, and how do I check?

Cerberus FTP Server versions before 2026.3.0 are in scope, but only where the web-based client is enabled for external authenticated users. Check the installed version number and whether that web client is enabled for external users.Source: labs.reversec.com

What should I do about it?

Upgrade Cerberus FTP Server to 2026.3.0 or later, which is the fixed version listed for this issue.Source: labs.reversec.com

Is it being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. CISA's SSVC assessment notes a proof of concept exists. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data