- Exploited
- No known exploitation
- Fix
- Fixed in 24.09.08
- Who is exposed
- Not reported
Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 24.09.08.
- Last modified
- A 0-100 score for how much a CVE matters across the industry: exploitation, exposure, how widely the software is used, severity and whether a fix exists.What do these mean? →
- 0/100 · provisional
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
Summary
Apache OFBiz is affected by an authorization bypass that lets a logged-in user with only limited content-create permission grant themselves the OWNER role on arbitrary content. That self-granted role then gives the attacker full read, write, and delete control over content they should not be able to access.
Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.
Read the original description
Incorrect Authorization in ContentPermissionServices in Apache OFBiz 24.09 before 24.09.08 on all platforms allows a remote authenticated attacker holding only a limited content-create permission to self-grant the OWNER role on arbitrary content by invoking the createContentRole service (e.g. via the createForumGroupRole request), causing the permission check to fall through to a fail-open default-grant branch when no ContentPurposeOperation entry matches the requested operation and content purpose, rather than denying the request. A self-granted OWNER role then satisfies the ownership check used to authorize update, removal, and status changes on that content, giving the attacker full read/write/delete control over content they should not have access to. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 24.09.08, which fixes this issue.
cve.now Index
- Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
- Exposure?/25Unknown. No advisory context yet
- Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
- Severity?/10Unknown. No CVSS score or vendor rating
- No patch0/5No signal
What would change the score
- Would score about 55 if added to CISA KEV
- Would score about 50 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
- Would score about 22 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed
What to do
Upgrade to a fixed version: 24.09.08.
Timeline
- CVE published
- First seen by cve.now
Affected versions
- Apache Software Foundation Apache OFBiz
fixed in 24.09.08
Evidence 1
- Advisory
Corrections
None so far.
Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.
Questions about CVE-2026-81744
Is CVE-2026-81744 being exploited?
It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data
Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-81744?
Apache OFBiz: before 24.09.08.Source: cve.now feed data
How do I fix CVE-2026-81744?
Upgrade to a fixed version: 24.09.08.Source: cve.now feed data