Skip to main content
← Vulnerabilities

XML comment injection in Saxy encoder via unescaped double hyphen

2.1LowCNA
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
Fixed in 1.7.0
Who is exposed
Not reported

Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 1.7.0.

Published
Last modified
12/100 · provisional
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub

Summary

Saxy, an Elixir XML library, does not escape the `--` sequence or a closing `-->` in comment content, so a local attacker who can supply text that an application writes as a comment can inject arbitrary markup into the serialized document, without logging in and without any user action. Downstream parsers may then read forged elements, attributes, or text, which becomes cross-site scripting when the output is rendered as HTML or SVG.

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

Read the original description

XML injection in the encoder of Saxy. Saxy.Encoder does not neutralize the -- sequence in XML comment content: escape_comment/2 returns the comment binary unchanged in every clause and only appends a space when the comment ends in a single -, so neither an interior -- nor a full --> is escaped or rejected before the encoder wraps the content in the <!-- and --> delimiters.

When an application serializes attacker-controlled text as a comment, through Saxy.XML.comment/1 or a raw {:comment, text} simple form child, the attacker can close the comment early with --> and inject arbitrary sibling markup into the serialized document. A downstream parser then sees elements, attributes, and text that the application never built. Where the document is rendered as HTML or SVG, the injected markup executes as stored cross-site scripting; where it is consumed by another XML processor, the attacker can forge data that the producing application never emitted. Documents that Saxy only parses are not a vector.

This issue affects saxy: from 0.7.0 before 1.7.0.

cve.now Index

12Pcve.now Index 12 of 100 · methodology v3 · provisional
  • Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
  • Exposure?/25Unknown. No advisory context yet
  • Reach10/20Affects Hex packages
  • Severity2.1/10CVSS 2.1
  • No patch0/5No signal

What would change the score

  • Would score about 67 if added to CISA KEV
  • Would score about 62 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
  • Would score about 34 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed

What to do

  • Upgrade to a fixed version: 1.7.0.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now

Affected versions

  • saxyHex

    From 0.7.0 · fixed in 1.7.0

  • qcam/saxy

    Version range not reported

  • saxyHex

    From 0.7.0 · fixed in 1.7.0

Evidence 5

  1. Advisory
  2. Patch
  3. Repository
  4. Link
  5. Link

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

Questions about CVE-2026-66293

Is CVE-2026-66293 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-66293?

saxy (Hex): from 0.7.0 before 1.7.0. saxy (Hex): from 0.7.0 before 1.7.0.Source: cve.now feed data

How do I fix CVE-2026-66293?

Upgrade to a fixed version: 1.7.0.Source: cve.now feed data