Skip to main content
← All vulnerabilities
CVE-2026-63338

IXP Manager has Broken Object-Level Authorization

Affects IXP Manager versions before 7.3.0, where an authenticated user can view and edit another user's resources without authorisation. Fixed in 7.3.0.

Published
Last modified
published
Not listed in CISA KEV
Specific setups only
Fix
Fixed in 7.3.0
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub

Summary

IXP Manager, a web application used to manage Internet Exchange Points, is affected by a flaw that lets any logged-in user view and modify another user's API key records. An attacker with a valid account could therefore read and change credentials belonging to other users, potentially gaining unauthorized access to their functions.

Summarized by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5. Verify details against the original sources.

Read the original description

IXP Manager is a full-stack web application for managing Internet Exchange Points. Prior to version 7.3.0, an authenticated user can view and edit a resource belonging to another user without authorization. The API-key edit/update path in `ApiKeyController` selects records by identifier without checking that `user_id` matches the caller, allowing access to another user's API-key record. This issue is fixed in version 7.3.0.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now

Affected versions

  • inex IXP-Manager

    fixed in 7.3.0

References 3

GitHub · inex/IXP-Manager

FAQ

Questions about CVE-2026-63338

What does this mean?

An authenticated user could view and edit a resource that belongs to another user, without the authorisation that should block that access.Source: github.com

Am I affected, and how do I check?

IXP Manager versions before 7.3.0 are affected, and the issue requires an authenticated user account. To check, compare the IXP Manager version in use with 7.3.0.Source: github.com

What should I do about it?

Upgrade IXP Manager to v7.3.0 as soon as possible. The advisory says this release addresses the issue.Source: github.com

Is it being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data