rabbitmq-c: Heap Buffer Overflow in amqp_send_frame() When Serializing Oversized AMQP_FRAME_BODY
Affects rabbitmq-c 0.16.0 and earlier in applications that pass an oversized body frame to amqp_send_frame(). Fixed in 0.17.0.
Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.
- Exploited
- No known exploitation
- Fix
- Fixed in 0.17.0
- Who is exposed
- Not reported
Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 0.17.0.
- Last modified
- Whether it needs action now or is a reference record, by fixed rules, with why. Last checked is when cve.now last re-read it.What do these mean? →
- Reference
- Last checked
- A 0-100 score for how much a CVE matters across the industry: exploitation, exposure, how widely the software is used, severity and whether a fix exists.What do these mean? →
- 27/100 · provisional
- How many real-world setups can hit the bug, from the vendor's advisory and CISA data. It does not know your setup.What do these mean? →
- Unclear
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
Summary
rabbitmq-c, a C client library for RabbitMQ's AMQP protocol, has a heap buffer overflow in amqp_send_frame() that lets an attacker remotely, without logging in, trigger an out-of-bounds write to heap memory, which can crash the process and corrupt memory.
Read the original description
rabbitmq-c is a C-language AMQP client library for RabbitMQ. Prior to version 0.17.0, a heap buffer overflow exists in rabbitmq-c when the public amqp_send_frame() API is used to serialize an oversized AMQP_FRAME_BODY. The issue occurs because amqp_frame_to_bytes() copies frame.payload.body_fragment.len bytes into the connection outbound buffer without validating that the body fragment fits within the allocated frame buffer. An application that passes an oversized body frame to amqp_send_frame() can trigger a heap out-of-bounds write, resulting in process crash and memory corruption. This issue has been patched in version 0.17.0.
cve.now Index
- Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
- Exposure17/25No login or user action needed, reachable over the network without a login · Unknown: Advisories don't say whether default setups are affected
- Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
- Severity9.8/10CVSS 9.8
- No patch0/5No signal
What would change the score
- Would score about 72 if added to CISA KEV
- Would score about 67 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
- Would score about 32 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed
What to do
Upgrade to a fixed version: 0.17.0.
Check your systems with an agent
Paste this into a coding or ops agent. It checks your systems read-only and reports a table per asset.
Check whether my systems are affected by CVE-2026-61547 (rabbitmq-c: Heap Buffer Overflow in amqp_send_frame() When Serializing Oversized AMQP_FRAME_BODY), using the cve.now data below. Rules: work read-only. Do not run exploit code, proof-of-concept scripts or scanners that send attack payloads, and do not change any configuration, package, image or deployment. Report findings only. What cve.now has for CVE-2026-61547 (entry last updated 2026-11-10): Affected: - alanxz rabbitmq-c: fixed in 0.17.0 Fixed versions: 0.17.0. Conditions (all must be true for the bug to be hit): - Affected versions are rabbitmq-c 0.16.0 and earlier. (source: https://github.com/alanxz/rabbitmq-c/security/advisories/GHSA-hfjv-vcp3-39wh) - The application passes an oversized body frame to amqp_send_frame(). (source: https://github.com/alanxz/rabbitmq-c/security/advisories/GHSA-hfjv-vcp3-39wh) Setup: unknown whether the bug needs a non-default feature or setting. Check the advisory. Attacker needs: network access, no login, no user action. CISA KEV: CVE-2026-61547 is not listed as of cve.now's last read. This KEV status is for CVE-2026-61547 only. If you also check another CVE, look up its own KEV status; never assume it from this one. How to check: - Installed software: check what is actually running, not what a repo declares. Read the version from each host, container image and Kubernetes node (the binary's version output, the OS package database, image layers), and check whether the conditions above hold there. Distribution packages may carry a backported fix under an older version number; confirm against the distribution's own advisory. Verify against the linked advisories before concluding, and cite the date you read each one: - https://github.com/alanxz/rabbitmq-c/security/advisories/GHSA-hfjv-vcp3-39wh - https://github.com/alanxz/rabbitmq-c/pull/892 - https://github.com/alanxz/rabbitmq-c/releases/tag/v0.17.0 Do not conclude an asset is unaffected unless you checked it and the evidence covers both its version and the conditions above. If you could not check something, mark it unknown and say what is missing. Report a table with one row per asset and these columns: Asset | Version or build | Status (affected, fixed, not applicable, unknown) | Compensating controls | Exposure (internet-facing, internal, none) | Evidence | Next action. Entry: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-61547 For follow-up questions, use the cve.now MCP server at https://mcp.cve.now/mcp (no authentication), for example get_vulnerability with id CVE-2026-61547.
Timeline
- CVE published
- First seen by cve.now
- Posted on X by cve.now
Affected versions
- alanxz rabbitmq-c
fixed in 0.17.0
Evidence 5
Vendor advisory · 1
Establishes: Affected and fixed versions.
- Advisory
CVE record · 2
Establishes: The identifier and description.
- Record
- Record
Other links · 2
- Repository
- Repository
Corrections
None so far.
Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.
Questions about CVE-2026-61547
Is CVE-2026-61547 being exploited?
It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data
What does this mean?
When amqp_send_frame() serializes an AMQP_FRAME_BODY that is larger than it should be, it can write past the end of a heap buffer. The advisory describes this as a heap out-of-bounds write.Source: github.com
Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-61547?
rabbitmq-c: before 0.17.0.Source: cve.now feed data
Am I affected, and how do I check?
Versions rabbitmq-c 0.16.0 and earlier are affected, but only in applications that pass an oversized body frame to the public amqp_send_frame() API. To check, look at the installed rabbitmq-c version and whether application code calls amqp_send_frame().Source: github.com
How do I fix CVE-2026-61547?
Upgrade rabbitmq-c to 0.17.0 or later, which contains the fix.Source: github.com