Skip to main content
← Vulnerabilities

In multiple functions of MediaProvider.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code.

—Not rated
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
Fixed in 15, 16, 16-qpr2, 17
Who is exposed
Not reported

Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 15, 16, 16-qpr2, 17.

Published
Last modified
Published
Not listed in CISA KEV
0/100 · provisional
Unclear
Fix
Fixed in 15, 16, 16-qpr2, 17
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub

Summary

In multiple functions of MediaProvider.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

What to do

  • Upgrade to a fixed version: 15, 16, 16-qpr2, 17.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now

Affected versions

  • Google Android

    17, 16-qpr2, 16, 15

Evidence 1

  1. Link

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

FAQ

Questions about CVE-2026-59022

What does this mean?

A logic error in several functions of Android's MediaProvider.java allows a permission bypass, meaning an app can get access that its permissions should block. Google's bulletin classifies the issue as an information disclosure.Source: source.android.com

Am I affected, and how do I check?

Google's bulletin lists Android 15, 16, 16-qpr2 and 17 for this issue, and the sources give no further setup conditions. To check a device's Android version, open Settings > About phone, or run adb shell getprop ro.build.version.release, and compare the security patch level with the one in Google's bulletin.Source: source.android.com

What should I do about it?

Install the Android security update for the release line in use, which Google's bulletin lists as fixed for Android 15, 16, 16-qpr2 and 17. Check the device's update settings for a security patch level that includes CVE-2026-59022.Source: source.android.com

Is it being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data