Skip to main content
← Vulnerabilities

The report details a heap Use-After-Free (UAF) vulnerability within the `android.hardware.automotive.evs-default` HAL service, stemming…

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

—Not rated
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
Fixed in 14, 15, 16, 16-qpr2, 17
Who is exposed
Not reported

Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 14, 15, 16, 16-qpr2, 17.

Published
Last modified
Published
Not listed in CISA KEV
0/100 · provisional
Unclear
Fix
Fixed in 14, 15, 16, 16-qpr2, 17
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub

Summary

The android.hardware.automotive.evs-default HAL service in Android is affected by a heap use-after-free flaw caused by unsynchronized access to a shared map. An unprivileged app that can reach the EVS manager could potentially run code inside this privileged service by making simultaneous calls to its extended-info functions.

Read the original description

The report details a heap Use-After-Free (UAF) vulnerability within the `android.hardware.automotive.evs-default` HAL service, stemming from unsynchronized access to an `std::unordered_map`. An unprivileged application with access to the EVS manager can trigger this UAF by making concurrent calls to `setExtendedInfo` and `getExtendedInfo`, potentially enabling code execution within the privileged HAL process.

What to do

  • Upgrade to a fixed version: 14, 15, 16, 16-qpr2, 17.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now

Affected versions

  • Google Android

    17, 16-qpr2, 16, 15, 14

Evidence 1

  1. Link

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

FAQ

Questions about CVE-2026-58925

What should I do about it?

Update Android to a release that includes the fix, which the advisory lists as 14, 15, 16, 16-qpr2, or 17. No workaround is listed in the facts.Source: source.android.com

Is it being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data