Skip to main content
← Vulnerabilities

In UsbDialogHelper of UsbDialogHelper.java, there is a possible UI confusion due to misleading or insufficient UI.

Affects Google Android; fixes are listed for Android 14, 15, 16, 16-qpr2, and 17. No vendor severity rating is given, so only the CVSS score of 8.4 (high) applies.

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

8.4HighCISA-ADP
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
Fixed in 14, 15, 16, 16-qpr2, 17
Who is exposed
Specific setups only

Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 14, 15, 16, 16-qpr2, 17.

Published
Last modified
Published
Not listed in CISA KEV
14/100 · provisional
Specific setups only
Fix
Fixed in 14, 15, 16, 16-qpr2, 17
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
  • Exploitation: none
  • Automatable: no
  • Technical impact: total

Summary

This vulnerability affects the Android operating system's USB dialog component, which prompts users to approve USB connections. Because the dialog's interface can mislead or fail to clearly convey what is being authorized, a local attacker could gain elevated privileges on the device without needing additional permissions.

Read the original description

In UsbDialogHelper of UsbDialogHelper.java, there is a possible UI confusion due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

What to do

  • Upgrade to a fixed version: 14, 15, 16, 16-qpr2, 17.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now
  3. CISA SSVC assessment

    Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total

  4. Record last updated

Affected versions

  • Google Android

    17, 16-qpr2, 16, 15, 14

Evidence 1

  1. Link

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

FAQ

Questions about CVE-2026-55257

What should I do about it?

Install the Android security update for the branch in use: 14, 15, 16, 16-qpr2, or 17. The sources list no workaround.Source: source.android.com

Is it being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data