Skip to main content
← Vulnerabilities

OpenHuman: Embedded Google Meet webview can silently capture the macOS desktop without a user gesture

6.1MediumCNA
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
Fixed in 0.56.0
Who is exposed
Not reported

Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 0.56.0.

Published
Last modified
13/100 · provisional
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
  • Exploitation: none
  • Automatable: no
  • Technical impact: partial

Summary

OpenHuman's embedded Google Meet webview on macOS can let page JavaScript capture the whole desktop without a fresh user gesture, if the app already has Screen Recording permission. An attacker who can run JavaScript in an allowed embedded origin can exploit this remotely, without logging in, to get a live desktop capture that may expose chats, documents, source code, email, credentials, and one-time codes.

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

Read the original description

OpenHuman is an open-source agent harness available as a desktop application and Rust library. Before 0.56.0 on macOS, the runtime injected into a supported remote account webview such as Google Meet allows page JavaScript to call getDisplayMedia without a live user gesture. Instead of rejecting the request, the shim falls through to native Chromium capture behavior, and the embedded CEF environment can auto-select the primary display because it lacks the normal desktop-media picker. If OpenHuman already has macOS Screen Recording permission and an attacker obtains JavaScript execution in an allowed embedded origin, the attacker can obtain a real desktop capture stream without a new user gesture. The stream can expose chats, documents, source code, email, meeting content, credentials, one-time codes, and other visible desktop information. The separate direct screen_share_begin_session IPC path failing origin validation does not prevent exploitation through getDisplayMedia. This issue is fixed in version 0.56.0.

cve.now Index

13Pcve.now Index 13 of 100 · methodology v3 · provisional
  • Exploitation0/40No signal
  • Exposure7/25Reachable over the network without a login · Unknown: No advisory context yet
  • Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
  • Severity6.1/10CVSS 6.1
  • No patch0/5No signal

What would change the score

  • Would score about 68 if added to CISA KEV
  • Would score about 63 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
  • Would score about 28 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed

What to do

  • Upgrade to a fixed version: 0.56.0.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now
  3. CISA SSVC assessment

    Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial

  4. Record last updated

Affected versions

  • tinyhumansai openhuman

    fixed in 0.56.0

Evidence 4

  1. Advisory
  2. Repository
  3. Repository
  4. Repository

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

Questions about CVE-2026-54144

Is CVE-2026-54144 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-54144?

openhuman: before 0.56.0.Source: cve.now feed data

How do I fix CVE-2026-54144?

Upgrade to a fixed version: 0.56.0.Source: cve.now feed data