CVE
Zephyr kernel stack memory leak in charger_get_prop() syscall
- Exploited
- No known exploitation
- Fix
- Fixed in 4.3.2, 4.5.0
- Who is exposed
- Not reported
Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 4.3.2, 4.5.0.
- Last modified
- Whether it needs action now or is a reference record, by fixed rules, with why. Last checked is when cve.now last re-read it.What do these mean? →
- Reference
- Last checked
- FIRST's estimate of the chance attackers exploit it in the next 30 days, updated daily.What do these mean? →
- 0.11% · 1st percentile
- A 0-100 score for how much a CVE matters across the industry: exploitation, exposure, how widely the software is used, severity and whether a fix exists.What do these mean? →
- 3/100 · provisional
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
Summary
The zephyr software's charger_get_prop() system call handler copies uninitialized kernel stack memory back to user-mode threads. A local user with low privileges, who has been granted access to a charger device, can repeat calls with chosen property IDs to read up to 12 to 16 bytes of kernel stack contents per call, depending on the target.
Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.
Read the original description
The user-mode system call verifier z_vrfy_charger_get_prop() in drivers/charger/charger_handlers.c declares an uninitialized union charger_propval k_val on the kernel (privileged) stack, passes it to the charger driver back end via z_impl_charger_get_prop(), and then copies the full sizeof(union charger_propval) back into the calling user thread's buffer with k_usermode_to_copy(). That discloses kernel stack contents on two paths:
On error. The copy-out ignores the driver's return code. In-tree back ends return an error without writing through the value pointer for properties they do not implement: charger_gpio_get_prop() returns -ENOTSUP unconditionally, and bq24190_get_prop() has a default: return -ENOTSUP; arm that never touches val. The whole union is then stack residue. On success. A back end writes only the one union member the requested property selects (for example sbs_charger.c writes the one-byte val->present for CHARGER_PROP_PRESENT and returns 0), yet the handler still copies the whole union, so every byte beyond that member is uninitialized.
The handler is compiled only when CONFIG_USERSPACE=y and is reachable by any user-mode thread that has been granted access to a charger device object. K_SYSCALL_DRIVER_CHARGER() validates only the device object and its API pointer, not the property identifier, so an unprivileged thread can choose prop freely: an unimplemented property forces the error path, a narrow one the success path, and the call can be repeated at will.
Each call discloses up to the size of the union (12 bytes on a 32-bit target, 16 bytes on 64-bit targets where the function-pointer members widen it) of supervisor-stack memory. The bytes are residue of earlier kernel-side frames on the thread's privileged stack and can contain kernel object addresses and saved return addresses, which an unprivileged thread cannot otherwise observe and which help defeat address-layout assumptions when exploiting a separate memory-safety defect. There is no integrity or availability impact.
Two commits fix it, and both are needed. 5054384e983c skips the copy-out when the back end reports an error. c31cac727d02 zeroes the union before the driver call, so the bytes copied out on success are driver-written data or zeros. A tree carrying only the first still leaks on every successful call.
cve.now Index
- Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
- Exposure?/25Unknown. No advisory context yet
- Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
- Severity3.3/10CVSS 3.3
- No patch0/5No signal
What would change the score
- Would score about 58 if added to CISA KEV
- Would score about 53 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
- Would score about 25 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed
What to do
Upgrade to a fixed version: 4.3.2, 4.5.0.
Check your systems with an agent
Paste this into a coding or ops agent. It checks your systems read-only and reports a table per asset.
Check whether my systems are affected by CVE-2026-19809 (Kernel stack information disclosure in the charger_get_prop() system call handler), using the cve.now data below.
Rules: work read-only. Do not run exploit code, proof-of-concept scripts or scanners that send attack payloads, and do not change any configuration, package, image or deployment. Report findings only.
What cve.now has for CVE-2026-19809 (entry last updated 2026-11-12):
Affected:
- zephyrproject zephyr: from 3.5.0, fixed in 4.3.2; from 4.4.0, fixed in 4.5.0
Fixed versions: 4.3.2, 4.5.0.
Setup: unknown whether the bug needs a non-default feature or setting. Check the advisory.
CISA KEV: CVE-2026-19809 is not listed as of cve.now's last read.
This KEV status is for CVE-2026-19809 only. If you also check another CVE, look up its own KEV status; never assume it from this one.
How to check:
- Installed software: check what is actually running, not what a repo declares. Read the version from each host, container image and Kubernetes node (the binary's version output, the OS package database, image layers), and check whether the conditions above hold there. Distribution packages may carry a backported fix under an older version number; confirm against the distribution's own advisory.
Verify against the linked advisories before concluding, and cite the date you read each one:
- https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/commit/5054384e983c105b90d704272abcd479486ae3a2
- https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/commit/c31cac727d029f273a67f65941985696f1882867
- https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/security/advisories/GHSA-rghm-r3c9-92qc
Do not conclude an asset is unaffected unless you checked it and the evidence covers both its version and the conditions above. If you could not check something, mark it unknown and say what is missing.
Report a table with one row per asset and these columns: Asset | Version or build | Status (affected, fixed, not applicable, unknown) | Compensating controls | Exposure (internet-facing, internal, none) | Evidence | Next action.
Entry: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-19809
For follow-up questions, use the cve.now MCP server at https://mcp.cve.now/mcp (no authentication), for example execute with name cve.get and arguments {"id": "CVE-2026-19809"}.Timeline
- CVE published
- First seen by cve.now
Affected versions
- zephyr
From 3.5.0 · fixed in 4.3.2; From 4.4.0 · fixed in 4.5.0
Evidence 5
Vendor advisory · 1
Establishes: Affected and fixed versions.
- Advisory
CVE record · 2
Establishes: The identifier and description.
- Record
- Record
Corrections
None so far.
Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.
Questions about CVE-2026-19809
Is CVE-2026-19809 being exploited?
It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data
Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-19809?
zephyr: from 3.5.0 before 4.3.2; from 4.4.0 before 4.5.0.Source: cve.now feed data
How do I fix CVE-2026-19809?
Upgrade to a fixed version: 4.3.2, 4.5.0.Source: cve.now feed data