Skip to main content
Menu
CVEs

CVE

datamodel-code-generator < 0.84.0 Code Injection via x-python-type Annotation

Affects datamodel-code-generator before 0.84.0 when generated models are evaluated by Pydantic v2 during model_rebuild(). Fixed in 0.84.0.

CVE-2026-127208

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

8.6HighCNA
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
Fixed in 0.84.0
Who is exposed
Specific setups only

Do first: Check whether your setup matches what the bug needs. datamodel-code-generator versions before 0.84.0 Attacker supplies a malicious JSON Schema with a crafted x-python-type annotation Generated models are evaluated by Pydantic v2 during model_rebuild()

Published
Last modified
Reference
Last checked
21/100 · provisional
Specific setups only
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub

Summary

The datamodel-code-generator tool, before version 0.84.0 (version omitted per rules), has a code injection flaw that lets an attacker run arbitrary code by supplying a malicious JSON Schema with a crafted x-python-type annotation. The attack can be reached remotely over the network without logging in, but it requires a user to take an action, and it affects developer workstations, CI/CD pipelines, and applications that import the generated models.

Read the original description

datamodel-code-generator before 0.84.0 contains a code injection vulnerability that allows attackers to achieve arbitrary code execution by supplying a malicious JSON Schema with a crafted x-python-type annotation containing a string ast.Constant node in a subscript slice position, which bypasses validation in parse_python_type_annotation and _python_type_expr_from_ast. Attackers can embed malicious Python expressions such as __import__ calls within quoted string literals in the generated source code, which Pydantic v2 evaluates as a ForwardRef via eval() during model_rebuild(), resulting in arbitrary code execution on developer workstations, CI/CD pipelines, or applications that generate and import the produced models at runtime.

Who should check

Teams running datamodel-code-generator before 0.84.0, including developer workstations, CI/CD pipelines, and apps that generate and import models at runtime

Read the source excerpt

“datamodel-code-generator before 0.84.0 contains a code injection vulnerability”

vulncheck.com

cve.now Index

21Pcve.now Index 21 of 100 · methodology v3 · provisional
  • Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
  • Exposure12/25Specific setups only, reachable over the network without a login
  • Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
  • Severity8.6/10CVSS 8.6
  • No patch0/5No signal

What would change the score

  • Would score about 71 if added to CISA KEV
  • Would score about 66 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active

What to do

  • Check whether your setup matches what the bug needs.

    datamodel-code-generator versions before 0.84.0 Attacker supplies a malicious JSON Schema with a crafted x-python-type annotation Generated models are evaluated by Pydantic v2 during model_rebuild()
  • Upgrade to a fixed version: 0.84.0.

Check your systems with an agent

Paste this into a coding or ops agent. It checks your systems read-only and reports a table per asset.

Check whether my systems are affected by CVE-2026-127208 (datamodel-code-generator < 0.84.0 Code Injection via x-python-type Annotation), using the cve.now data below.

Rules: work read-only. Do not run exploit code, proof-of-concept scripts or scanners that send attack payloads, and do not change any configuration, package, image or deployment. Report findings only.

What cve.now has for CVE-2026-127208 (entry last updated 2026-11-12):
Affected:
- datamodel-code-generator datamodel-code-generator: fixed in 0.84.0
Fixed versions: 0.84.0.
Conditions (all must be true for the bug to be hit):
- datamodel-code-generator versions before 0.84.0 (source: https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/datamodel-code-generator-code-injection-via-x-python-type-annotation)
- Attacker supplies a malicious JSON Schema with a crafted x-python-type annotation (source: https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/datamodel-code-generator-code-injection-via-x-python-type-annotation)
- Generated models are evaluated by Pydantic v2 during model_rebuild() (source: https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/datamodel-code-generator-code-injection-via-x-python-type-annotation)
Setup: unknown whether the bug needs a non-default feature or setting. Check the advisory.
Attacker needs: network access, no login, a user action.
CISA KEV: CVE-2026-127208 is not listed as of cve.now's last read.
This KEV status is for CVE-2026-127208 only. If you also check another CVE, look up its own KEV status; never assume it from this one.

How to check:
- Installed software: check what is actually running, not what a repo declares. Read the version from each host, container image and Kubernetes node (the binary's version output, the OS package database, image layers), and check whether the conditions above hold there. Distribution packages may carry a backported fix under an older version number; confirm against the distribution's own advisory.

Verify against the linked advisories before concluding, and cite the date you read each one:
- https://github.com/datamodel-code-generator/datamodel-code-generator/commit/ebfc11d0644d37a71374b28aac06d98748e584ec
- https://github.com/datamodel-code-generator/datamodel-code-generator/releases/tag/0.84.0
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/datamodel-code-generator-code-injection-via-x-python-type-annotation
Do not conclude an asset is unaffected unless you checked it and the evidence covers both its version and the conditions above. If you could not check something, mark it unknown and say what is missing.

Report a table with one row per asset and these columns: Asset | Version or build | Status (affected, fixed, not applicable, unknown) | Compensating controls | Exposure (internet-facing, internal, none) | Evidence | Next action.

Entry: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-127208
For follow-up questions, use the cve.now MCP server at https://mcp.cve.now/mcp (no authentication), for example execute with name cve.get and arguments {"id": "CVE-2026-127208"}.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now

Affected versions

  • datamodel-code-generator datamodel-code-generator

    fixed in 0.84.0

Evidence 5

CVE record · 2

Establishes: The identifier and description.

  1. Record
  2. Record

Other links · 3

  1. Patch
  2. Repository
  3. Link

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

Questions about CVE-2026-127208

Is CVE-2026-127208 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

What does this mean?

A malicious JSON Schema with a crafted x-python-type annotation can lead to arbitrary code execution. Pydantic v2 evaluates the annotation as a ForwardRef via eval() during model_rebuild().Source: vulncheck.com

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-127208?

datamodel-code-generator: before 0.84.0.Source: cve.now feed data

Am I affected, and how do I check?

The issue affects datamodel-code-generator versions before 0.84.0. Generated models that are evaluated by Pydantic v2 during model_rebuild() are the setup in which it applies. The installed version can be checked with pip show datamodel-code-generator.Source: vulncheck.com

How do I fix CVE-2026-127208?

Upgrade datamodel-code-generator to 0.84.0 or later, which is the listed fixed version.Source: vulncheck.com