CVE
OpsTree BuildPiper account takeover via brute-forced password reset codes
OpsTree Solutions' BuildPiper versions before 2.7.0 are affected. The fix is 2.7.0.
Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
- Exploited
- No known exploitation
- Fix
- Fixed in 2.7.0
- Who is exposed
- Not reported
Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 2.7.0.
- Last modified
- Whether it needs action now or is a reference record, by fixed rules, with why. Last checked is when cve.now last re-read it.What do these mean? →
- Reference
- Last checked
- FIRST's estimate of the chance attackers exploit it in the next 30 days, updated daily.What do these mean? →
- 0.33% · 26th percentile
- A 0-100 score for how much a CVE matters across the industry: exploitation, exposure, how widely the software is used, severity and whether a fix exists.What do these mean? →
- 26/100 · provisional
- How many real-world setups can hit the bug, from the vendor's advisory and CISA data. It does not know your setup.What do these mean? →
- Unclear
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
Summary
OpsTree Solutions' BuildPiper, before the fixed release, lacks rate limiting on the password-reset one-time code check, so an attacker can reach it remotely without logging in and guess 6-digit codes until one works. A successful guess lets the attacker reset the target's password and take over the account.
Original description
OpsTree BuildPiper before 2.7.0 lacks rate limiting on password-reset OTP verification, allowing unauthenticated attackers to brute force 6-digit OTPs. Attackers can initiate a reset and submit unthrottled guesses to the check_otp endpoint, resetting the target's password and taking over the account.
Who should check
Teams running OpsTree BuildPiper versions before 2.7.0
“Affecting BuildPiper >= 0, < 2.7.0”
cve.now Index
- Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
- Exposure17/25No login or user action needed, reachable over the network without a login · Unknown: Advisories don't say whether default setups are affected
- Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
- Severity9.1/10CVSS 9.1
- No patch0/5No signal
What would change the score
- Would score about 71 if added to CISA KEV
- Would score about 66 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
- Would score about 31 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed
What to do
Upgrade to a fixed version: 2.7.0.
Check your systems with an agent
Paste this into a coding or ops agent. It checks your systems read-only and reports a table per asset.
Check whether my systems are affected by CVE-2026-127079 (OpsTree BuildPiper before 2.7.0 OTP Brute Force via password_reset/check_otp), using the cve.now data below.
Rules: work read-only. Do not run exploit code, proof-of-concept scripts or scanners that send attack payloads, and do not change any configuration, package, image or deployment. Report findings only.
What cve.now has for CVE-2026-127079 (entry last updated 2026-11-13):
Affected:
- OpsTree Solutions BuildPiper: fixed in 2.7.0
Fixed versions: 2.7.0.
Conditions (all must be true for the bug to be hit):
- BuildPiper versions before 2.7.0 (source: https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/opstree-buildpiper-before-2.7.0-otp-brute-force-via-password-reset-check-otp)
Setup: unknown whether the bug needs a non-default feature or setting. Check the advisory.
Attacker needs: network access, no login, no user action.
CISA KEV: CVE-2026-127079 is not listed as of cve.now's last read.
This KEV status is for CVE-2026-127079 only. If you also check another CVE, look up its own KEV status; never assume it from this one.
How to check:
- Installed software: check what is actually running, not what a repo declares. Read the version from each host, container image and Kubernetes node (the binary's version output, the OS package database, image layers), and check whether the conditions above hold there. Distribution packages may carry a backported fix under an older version number; confirm against the distribution's own advisory.
Verify against the linked advisories before concluding, and cite the date you read each one:
- https://www.buildpiper.io/
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/opstree-buildpiper-before-2.7.0-otp-brute-force-via-password-reset-check-otp
Do not conclude an asset is unaffected unless you checked it and the evidence covers both its version and the conditions above. If you could not check something, mark it unknown and say what is missing.
Report a table with one row per asset and these columns: Asset | Version or build | Status (affected, fixed, not applicable, unknown) | Compensating controls | Exposure (internet-facing, internal, none) | Evidence | Next action.
Entry: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-127079
For follow-up questions, use the cve.now MCP server at https://mcp.cve.now/mcp (no authentication), for example execute with name cve.get and arguments {"id": "CVE-2026-127079"}.Timeline
- CVE published
- First seen by cve.now
- Posted on X by cve.now
Affected versions
- OpsTree Solutions BuildPiper
fixed in 2.7.0
Evidence 5
CVE record · 2
Establishes: The identifier and description.
- Record
- Record
Public exploit code · 1
Establishes: Public exploit code exists (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei and GitHub).
- Exploit
Corrections
None so far.
Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.
Questions about CVE-2026-127079
Is CVE-2026-127079 being exploited?
It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data
What does this mean?
The bug lets an attacker brute force the 6-digit one-time password (OTP) used in BuildPiper's password reset. With a correct OTP, the attacker can reset the target's password and take over the account.Source: vulncheck.com
Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-127079?
BuildPiper: before 2.7.0.Source: cve.now feed data
Am I affected, and how do I check?
BuildPiper versions before 2.7.0 are in the affected range. To check a installation, look up its BuildPiper version and compare it with 2.7.0.Source: vulncheck.com
How do I fix CVE-2026-127079?
Upgrade BuildPiper to 2.7.0 or later, which is the listed fixed version.Source: vulncheck.com