Padloc 4.0.0 before 4.3.1 Prototype Pollution via SCIM PATCH setPath()
Padloc server 4.0.0 up to but not including 4.3.1 is affected when SCIM is enabled, with 4.3.0 confirmed affected. Upgrading the server to 4.3.1 or later fixes it.
Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.
- Exploited
- No known exploitation
- Fix
- Fixed in 4.3.1
- Who is exposed
- Specific setups only
Do first: Check whether your setup matches what the bug needs. Padloc server version 4.0.0 up to but not including 4.3.1 (confirmed affected release: 4.3.0) SCIM must be enabled on the server
- Published
- Last modified
- Whether it needs action now or is a reference record, by fixed rules, with why. Last checked is when cve.now last re-read it.What do these mean? →
- Reference
- Last checked
- A 0-100 score for how much a CVE matters across the industry: exploitation, exposure, how widely the software is used, severity and whether a fix exists.What do these mean? →
- 15/100 · provisional
- How many real-world setups can hit the bug, from the vendor's advisory and CISA data. It does not know your setup.What do these mean? →
- Specific setups only
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
Summary
Padloc 4.0.0 before 4.3.1 is affected by a prototype pollution flaw in its SCIM user-patch handling. Remotely, an attacker holding a SCIM token can pollute the shared server process and disrupt requests for other organizations.
Read the original description
Padloc 4.0.0 before 4.3.1 contains a prototype pollution vulnerability that allows SCIM token holders to modify Object.prototype by sending crafted SCIM PATCH paths to ScimServer._handleScimUsersPatch(). Attackers can supply paths like __proto__.x or constructor.prototype.x passed to setPath() to pollute the shared server process, disrupting requests for all other organizations.
Who should check
Teams running the Padloc @padloc/server (4.0.0 to before 4.3.1) with SCIM user provisioning enabled, including self-hosted and Docker deployments
cve.now Index
- Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
- Exposure8/25Specific setups only, reachable over the network
- Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
- Severity7/10CVSS 7.0
- No patch0/5No signal
What would change the score
- Would score about 65 if added to CISA KEV
- Would score about 60 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
- Would score about 22 if CISA's SSVC rates it automatable
What to do
Check whether your setup matches what the bug needs.
Padloc server version 4.0.0 up to but not including 4.3.1 (confirmed affected release: 4.3.0) SCIM must be enabled on the serverUpgrade to a fixed version: 4.3.1.
Check your systems with an agent
Paste this into a coding or ops agent. It checks your systems read-only and reports a table per asset.
Check whether my systems are affected by CVE-2026-126570 (Padloc 4.0.0 before 4.3.1 Prototype Pollution via SCIM PATCH setPath()), using the cve.now data below. Rules: work read-only. Do not run exploit code, proof-of-concept scripts or scanners that send attack payloads, and do not change any configuration, package, image or deployment. Report findings only. What cve.now has for CVE-2026-126570 (entry last updated 2026-11-11): Affected: - padloc padloc: from 4.0.0, fixed in 4.3.1 Fixed versions: 4.3.1. Conditions (all must be true for the bug to be hit): - Padloc server version 4.0.0 up to but not including 4.3.1 (confirmed affected release: 4.3.0) (source: https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/padloc-4.0.0-before-4.3.1-prototype-pollution-via-scim-patch-setpath) - SCIM must be enabled on the server (source: https://github.com/padloc/padloc/security/advisories/GHSA-crhv-mjrg-8vwm) Setup: unknown whether the bug needs a non-default feature or setting. Check the advisory. Attacker needs: network access, high-privilege login, no user action. CISA KEV: CVE-2026-126570 is not listed as of cve.now's last read. This KEV status is for CVE-2026-126570 only. If you also check another CVE, look up its own KEV status; never assume it from this one. How to check: - Installed software: check what is actually running, not what a repo declares. Read the version from each host, container image and Kubernetes node (the binary's version output, the OS package database, image layers), and check whether the conditions above hold there. Distribution packages may carry a backported fix under an older version number; confirm against the distribution's own advisory. Verify against the linked advisories before concluding, and cite the date you read each one: - https://github.com/padloc/padloc/security/advisories/GHSA-crhv-mjrg-8vwm - https://github.com/padloc/padloc/commit/7dd3d230ef299c71ac215c802600b5f2358f7ba3 - https://github.com/padloc/padloc/blob/v4.3.0/packages/server/src/scim.ts#L421-L428 - https://github.com/padloc/padloc/blob/v4.3.0/packages/core/src/util.ts#L239-L251 - https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/padloc-4.0.0-before-4.3.1-prototype-pollution-via-scim-patch-setpath Do not conclude an asset is unaffected unless you checked it and the evidence covers both its version and the conditions above. If you could not check something, mark it unknown and say what is missing. Report a table with one row per asset and these columns: Asset | Version or build | Status (affected, fixed, not applicable, unknown) | Compensating controls | Exposure (internet-facing, internal, none) | Evidence | Next action. Entry: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-126570 For follow-up questions, use the cve.now MCP server at https://mcp.cve.now/mcp (no authentication), for example get_vulnerability with id CVE-2026-126570.
Timeline
- CVE published
- First seen by cve.now
Affected versions
- padloc padloc
From 4.0.0 · fixed in 4.3.1
Evidence 7
Vendor advisory · 1
Establishes: Affected and fixed versions.
- Advisory
CVE record · 2
Establishes: The identifier and description.
- Record
- Record
Other links · 4
- Patch
- Repository
- Repository
- Link
Corrections
None so far.
Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.
Questions about CVE-2026-126570
Is CVE-2026-126570 being exploited?
It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data
What does this mean?
A flaw in how SCIM PATCH requests are processed lets a request modify Object.prototype in the shared server process. This can cause request failures and disruption for other organizations handled by the same server.Source: vulncheck.com, github.com
Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-126570?
padloc: from 4.0.0 before 4.3.1.Source: cve.now feed data
Am I affected, and how do I check?
Padloc server versions 4.0.0 up to but not including 4.3.1 are affected, with 4.3.0 confirmed affected, and SCIM must be enabled on the server. To check, look at the server version and whether SCIM is enabled in its configuration.Source: vulncheck.com, github.com
How do I fix CVE-2026-126570?
Upgrade the server to 4.3.1 or later.Source: vulncheck.com, github.com