Skip to main content
Menu
CVEs

CVE

Hono request forgery bypass in CSRF middleware

CVE-2026-126355GHSA-46WX-V44X-9HH2EUVD-2026-124735

5.3MediumCNA
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
Fixed in 4.13.16
Who is exposed
Not reported

Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 4.13.16.

Published
Last modified
Reference
Last checked
0.18% · 7th percentile
32/100 · provisional
80% of hono downloads last week were affected versions (83.8M).npm, 105.3M downloads in the last 7 days, read Nov 8, 2026
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub

Summary

Hono's `csrf()` middleware does not check POST requests sent through browser hyperlink auditing (`text/ping`), so those requests skip both its Origin and Sec-Fetch-Site checks. A remote attacker without a login could, by getting a user to click a crafted link in Chrome or Edge, make the user's browser send a cross-origin POST that changes state on endpoints selected by path or query string, though the user's cookie must accompany the request.

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

Read the original description

Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. Prior to 4.13.16, csrf() limits origin validation to the content types normally sent by HTML forms and therefore does not validate text/ping requests generated by Chromium hyperlink auditing. Chrome and Edge can send a cross-origin credentialed POST without a CORS preflight through an <a ping> action, and the middleware then skips both Origin and Sec-Fetch-Site checks. The fixed request body limits exploitation to state-changing endpoints whose effect is selected by the path or query string and does not depend on submitted body data. The user's cookie must accompany the request, which generally requires a same-site origin or a cookie configured with SameSite=None, and Firefox does not send hyperlink-auditing pings by default. This issue is fixed in version 4.13.16.

cve.now Index

32Pcve.now Index 32 of 100 · methodology v3 · provisional
  • Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
  • Exposure7/25Reachable over the network without a login · Unknown: No advisory context yet
  • Reach20/20hono: 104.5M downloads a week
  • Severity5.3/10CVSS 5.3
  • No patch0/5No signal

What would change the score

  • Would score about 87 if added to CISA KEV
  • Would score about 82 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
  • Would score about 47 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed

Impact

  • Widely used

    hono has 104.5m weekly downloads.Source: npmjs.com

    104.2k packages depend on hono.Source: deps.dev

What to do

  • Upgrade to a fixed version: 4.13.16.

Check your systems with an agent

Paste this into a coding or ops agent. It checks your systems read-only and reports a table per asset.

Check whether my systems are affected by CVE-2026-126355 (Hono: `csrf()` does not check requests sent by hyperlink auditing (`text/ping`)), using the cve.now data below.

Rules: work read-only. Do not run exploit code, proof-of-concept scripts or scanners that send attack payloads, and do not change any configuration, package, image or deployment. Report findings only.

What cve.now has for CVE-2026-126355 (entry last updated 2026-11-12):
Affected:
- honojs hono: fixed in 4.13.16
- npm package hono: fixed in 4.13.16
Fixed versions: 4.13.16.
Setup: unknown whether the bug needs a non-default feature or setting. Check the advisory.
CISA KEV: CVE-2026-126355 is not listed as of cve.now's last read.
This KEV status is for CVE-2026-126355 only. If you also check another CVE, look up its own KEV status; never assume it from this one.

How to check:
- Packages (npm): find every lockfile in each project and run the stack.check operation of the cve.now MCP server (execute) on each one. Compare the resolved versions, not the ranges a manifest declares, with the affected versions above. Include transitive dependencies.

Verify against the linked advisories before concluding, and cite the date you read each one:
- https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-46wx-v44x-9hh2
- https://github.com/honojs/hono/commit/bf16471913b5199212dac33f5d170f94745dd26a
- https://github.com/honojs/hono/releases/tag/v4.13.16
Do not conclude an asset is unaffected unless you checked it and the evidence covers both its version and the conditions above. If you could not check something, mark it unknown and say what is missing.

Report a table with one row per asset and these columns: Asset | Version or build | Status (affected, fixed, not applicable, unknown) | Compensating controls | Exposure (internet-facing, internal, none) | Evidence | Next action.

Entry: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-126355
For follow-up questions, use the cve.now MCP server at https://mcp.cve.now/mcp (no authentication), for example execute with name cve.get and arguments {"id": "CVE-2026-126355"}.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now

Affected versions

  • honojs hono

    fixed in 4.13.16

  • hononpm

    fixed in 4.13.16

    Fixed in 4.13.16 (released Nov 1, 2026, 11 days before disclosure).

    The latest release, 4.13.17, is not affected.

Evidence 5

Vendor advisory · 1

Establishes: Affected and fixed versions.

  1. Advisory

CVE record · 2

Establishes: The identifier and description.

  1. Record
  2. Record

Other links · 2

  1. Repository
  2. Repository

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

Questions about CVE-2026-126355

Is CVE-2026-126355 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-126355?

hono: before 4.13.16. hono (npm): before 4.13.16.Source: cve.now feed data

How do I fix CVE-2026-126355?

Upgrade to a fixed version: 4.13.16.Source: cve.now feed data