Skip to main content
Menu
CVEs

CVE

A uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail…

Affects FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, 7.6.0 through 7.6.6 and 7.4.0 through 7.4.6. The advisory names 8.0.2 or above as the fix.

CVE-2026-126161EUVD-2026-123835

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

7.5HighCNA
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
Fixed in 8.0.2
Who is exposed
Not reported

Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 8.0.2.

Published
Last modified
Reference
Last checked
39/100 · provisional
Unclear
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
On X
View the cve.now post

Summary

A uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.6 may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial of service via repeated unauthenticated POST requests.

Who should check

Teams running Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0-8.0.1, 7.6.0-7.6.6 or 7.4.0-7.4.6, including on-premises deployments; FortiMail Cloud customers need not act.

Read the source excerpt

“An Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability [CWE-400] in FortiMail may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker”

fortiguard.fortinet.com

cve.now Index

39Pcve.now Index 39 of 100 · methodology v3 · provisional
  • Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
  • Exposure17/25No login or user action needed, reachable over the network without a login · Unknown: Advisories don't say whether default setups are affected
  • Reach14/20Affects Fortinet (an enterprise product or network appliance)
  • Severity7.5/10CVSS 7.5
  • No patch0/5No signal

What would change the score

  • Would score about 84 if added to CISA KEV
  • Would score about 79 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
  • Would score about 44 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed

What to do

  • Upgrade to a fixed version: 8.0.2.

Check your systems with an agent

Paste this into a coding or ops agent. It checks your systems read-only and reports a table per asset.

Check whether my systems are affected by CVE-2026-126161 (A uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail…), using the cve.now data below.

Rules: work read-only. Do not run exploit code, proof-of-concept scripts or scanners that send attack payloads, and do not change any configuration, package, image or deployment. Report findings only.

What cve.now has for CVE-2026-126161 (entry last updated 2026-11-11):
Affected:
- Fortinet FortiMail: from 8.0.0, through 8.0.1; from 7.6.0, through 7.6.6; from 7.4.0, through 7.4.6
Fixed versions: 8.0.2.
Conditions (all must be true for the bug to be hit):
- Affected FortiMail versions: 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, 7.4.0 through 7.4.6. (source: https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-213)
Setup: unknown whether the bug needs a non-default feature or setting. Check the advisory.
Attacker needs: network access, no login, no user action.
CISA KEV: CVE-2026-126161 is not listed as of cve.now's last read.
This KEV status is for CVE-2026-126161 only. If you also check another CVE, look up its own KEV status; never assume it from this one.

How to check:
- Installed software: check what is actually running, not what a repo declares. Read the version from each host, container image and Kubernetes node (the binary's version output, the OS package database, image layers), and check whether the conditions above hold there. Distribution packages may carry a backported fix under an older version number; confirm against the distribution's own advisory.

Verify against the linked advisories before concluding, and cite the date you read each one:
- https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-213
Do not conclude an asset is unaffected unless you checked it and the evidence covers both its version and the conditions above. If you could not check something, mark it unknown and say what is missing.

Report a table with one row per asset and these columns: Asset | Version or build | Status (affected, fixed, not applicable, unknown) | Compensating controls | Exposure (internet-facing, internal, none) | Evidence | Next action.

Entry: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-126161
For follow-up questions, use the cve.now MCP server at https://mcp.cve.now/mcp (no authentication), for example execute with name cve.get and arguments {"id": "CVE-2026-126161"}.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now1 day
  3. Posted on X by cve.now

Affected versions

  • Fortinet FortiMail

    From 8.0.0 · through 8.0.1; From 7.6.0 · through 7.6.6; From 7.4.0 · through 7.4.6

Evidence 3

Vendor advisory · 1

Establishes: Affected and fixed versions.

  1. Link

CVE record · 2

Establishes: The identifier and description.

  1. Record
  2. Record

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

Questions about CVE-2026-126161

Is CVE-2026-126161 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

What does this mean?

A resource exhaustion flaw lets a remote attacker without logging in cause a denial of service on the FortiMail device by sending repeated unauthenticated POST requests.Source: fortiguard.fortinet.com

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-126161?

FortiMail: from 8.0.0 through 8.0.1; from 7.6.0 through 7.6.6; from 7.4.0 through 7.4.6.Source: cve.now feed data

Am I affected, and how do I check?

Affected versions are FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, and 7.4.0 through 7.4.6. Check the installed firmware version in the FortiMail admin interface or with the version command on the device.Source: fortiguard.fortinet.com

How do I fix CVE-2026-126161?

Upgrade to 8.0.2 or above, as the advisory states. The facts list no fixed version for the 7.6 or 7.4 branches.Source: fortiguard.fortinet.com