Skip to main content
← Vulnerabilities

Active Storage: Unsigned Content-Type in Active Storage GCS direct uploads with cache_control

4.7MediumCNA
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
Fixed in 8.1.4.1, 8.0.5.2
Who is exposed
Not reported

Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 8.1.4.1, 8.0.5.2.

Published
Last modified
Reference
Last checked
29/100 · provisional
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub

Summary

Active Storage makes it simple to upload and reference files in cloud services and attach those files to Active Record objects. Prior to 8.1.4.1 and 8.0.5.2, when a GCS service is configured with the cache_control option, ActiveStorage::Service::GCSService#url_for_direct_upload signs direct-upload URLs with V4, and the V4 signature covers only the Cache-Control and Host headers. A direct-upload client can therefore send a Content-Type of its choosing, and can omit the declared Content-MD5, without invalidating the URL. GCS stores the supplied content type as object metadata, which takes precedence over the response-content-type that Active Storage sets on download URLs, so an uploaded object could be served as inline HTML under the application's bucket path on storage.googleapis.com. Script in such an object runs on the storage origin rather than the application's, but could register a Service Worker scoped to the bucket path and read or replace a victim's later responses for signed URLs in that bucket. Applications that use the GCS service with cache_control configured and accept direct uploads are affected. GCS services without cache_control sign with V2 and are not affected. This issue is fixed in versions 8.1.4.1 and 8.0.5.2.

cve.now Index

29Pcve.now Index 29 of 100 · methodology v3 · provisional
  • Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
  • Exposure7/25Reachable over the network without a login · Unknown: No advisory context yet
  • Reach17/20Affects Ruby on Rails (a widely deployed server, runtime, framework or database)
  • Severity4.7/10CVSS 4.7
  • No patch0/5No signal

What would change the score

  • Would score about 84 if added to CISA KEV
  • Would score about 79 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
  • Would score about 44 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed

What to do

  • Upgrade to a fixed version: 8.1.4.1, 8.0.5.2.

Check your systems with an agent

Paste this into a coding or ops agent. It checks your systems read-only and reports a table per asset.

Check whether my systems are affected by CVE-2026-126084 (Active Storage: Unsigned Content-Type in Active Storage GCS direct uploads with cache_control), using the cve.now data below.

Rules: work read-only. Do not run exploit code, proof-of-concept scripts or scanners that send attack payloads, and do not change any configuration, package, image or deployment. Report findings only.

What cve.now has for CVE-2026-126084 (entry last updated 2026-11-10):
Affected:
- rails rails: from 8.1, fixed in 8.1.4.1; fixed in 8.0.5.2
Fixed versions: 8.1.4.1, 8.0.5.2.
Setup: unknown whether the bug needs a non-default feature or setting. Check the advisory.
CISA KEV: CVE-2026-126084 is not listed as of cve.now's last read.
This KEV status is for CVE-2026-126084 only. If you also check another CVE, look up its own KEV status; never assume it from this one.

How to check:
- Installed software: check what is actually running, not what a repo declares. Read the version from each host, container image and Kubernetes node (the binary's version output, the OS package database, image layers), and check whether the conditions above hold there. Distribution packages may carry a backported fix under an older version number; confirm against the distribution's own advisory.

Verify against the linked advisories before concluding, and cite the date you read each one:
- https://github.com/rails/rails/security/advisories/GHSA-3w93-6hmw-whh4
- https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/8d93f6a872e9550a91bf0e4fce50083a235ef3b1
- https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/ddc08ba61a8001e7402864c62e466cf732fc7614
- https://github.com/rails/rails/releases/tag/v8.0.5.2
- https://github.com/rails/rails/releases/tag/v8.1.4.1
Do not conclude an asset is unaffected unless you checked it and the evidence covers both its version and the conditions above. If you could not check something, mark it unknown and say what is missing.

Report a table with one row per asset and these columns: Asset | Version or build | Status (affected, fixed, not applicable, unknown) | Compensating controls | Exposure (internet-facing, internal, none) | Evidence | Next action.

Entry: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-126084
For follow-up questions, use the cve.now MCP server at https://mcp.cve.now/mcp (no authentication), for example get_vulnerability with id CVE-2026-126084.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now

Affected versions

  • rails rails

    From 8.1 · fixed in 8.1.4.1; fixed in 8.0.5.2

Evidence 7

Vendor advisory · 1

Establishes: Affected and fixed versions.

  1. Advisory

CVE record · 2

Establishes: The identifier and description.

  1. Record
  2. Record

Other links · 4

  1. Repository
  2. Repository
  3. Repository
  4. Repository

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

Questions about CVE-2026-126084

Is CVE-2026-126084 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-126084?

rails: from 8.1 before 8.1.4.1; before 8.0.5.2.Source: cve.now feed data

How do I fix CVE-2026-126084?

Upgrade to a fixed version: 8.1.4.1, 8.0.5.2.Source: cve.now feed data