Skip to main content
← Vulnerabilities

Storyden through 1.26.16 Privilege Escalation via MANAGE_ROLES Role Assignment

Only affects Storyden through v1.26.16, where a custom role holding only MANAGE_ROLES can grant the built-in Admin role. No vendor rating is given and no fix is listed in the facts.

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

8.6HighCNA
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
Fix or patch referenced
Who is exposed
Specific setups only

Do first: Check whether your setup matches what the bug needs. Affects Storyden through release v1.26.16, confirmed on the main branch at a specific commit The attacker's account holds a custom role with the MANAGE_ROLES permission and without ADMINISTRATOR

Published
Last modified
17/100 · provisional
Specific setups only
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub

Summary

Storyden, through version 1.26.16, lets users who hold the MANAGE_ROLES permission grant themselves or others the ADMINISTRATOR permission without being administrators, which allows full takeover of the instance. An attacker reaches it remotely over the network, but must first log in with a account holding MANAGE_ROLES (high privileges required).

Read the original description

Storyden through 1.26.16 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows users holding MANAGE_ROLES to grant the ADMINISTRATOR permission without being administrators. Attackers can call AccountAddRole on another controlled account or use RoleCreate and RoleUpdate to create administrator roles, taking full control of the instance.

cve.now Index

17Pcve.now Index 17 of 100 · methodology v3 · provisional
  • Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
  • Exposure8/25Specific setups only, reachable over the network
  • Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
  • Severity8.6/10CVSS 8.6
  • No patch0/5No signal

What would change the score

  • Would score about 67 if added to CISA KEV
  • Would score about 62 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
  • Would score about 24 if CISA's SSVC rates it automatable

What to do

  • Check whether your setup matches what the bug needs.

    Affects Storyden through release v1.26.16, confirmed on the main branch at a specific commit The attacker's account holds a custom role with the MANAGE_ROLES permission and without ADMINISTRATOR
  • Apply the patch listed under Evidence.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now

Affected versions

  • Southclaws storyden

    through 1.26.16

Evidence 5

  1. Patch
  2. Report
  3. Repository
  4. Repository
  5. Link

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

Questions about CVE-2026-125360

Is CVE-2026-125360 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

What does this mean?

A user who holds a custom role with the MANAGE_ROLES permission, but not ADMINISTRATOR, can assign the built-in Admin role to accounts they control. That gives them full control of the instance, including deleting content, managing all accounts, and changing instance-wide settings.Source: github.com, vulncheck.com

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-125360?

storyden: through 1.26.16.Source: cve.now feed data

Am I affected, and how do I check?

The affected range runs from the start of the product's history through release v1.26.16, and the issue was confirmed on the main branch at commit 609e4db12b8a0cd7f44287957c0a709b56a265e2. To check a setup, look at whether any custom role has the MANAGE_ROLES permission without ADMINISTRATOR, and compare your installed version against v1.26.16.Source: github.com, vulncheck.com

How do I fix CVE-2026-125360?

The facts do not name a fixed release, so no upgrade target can be given from them. Check the project's release notes for a version later than v1.26.16 that addresses this issue.Source: github.com, vulncheck.com