OpenEMR before 8.3.0 SQL Injection via Fee Sheet warehouse parameter
Affects OpenEMR before 8.3.0 for authenticated users whose role passes the fee_sheet ACL check, which includes Clinicians by default. Fixed in 8.3.0.
Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.
- Exploited
- No known exploitation
- Fix
- Fixed in 8.3.0
- Who is exposed
- Specific setups only
Do first: Check whether your setup matches what the bug needs. Authenticated user whose role passes the fee_sheet ACL check (encounters|coding), which includes clinical staff such as Clinicians by default. Saving a Fee Sheet product line with the warehouse field in the drug-inventory lookup.
- Last modified
- A 0-100 score for how much a CVE matters across the industry: exploitation, exposure, how widely the software is used, severity and whether a fix exists.What do these mean? →
- 17/100 · provisional
- How many real-world setups can hit the bug, from the vendor's advisory and CISA data. It does not know your setup.What do these mean? →
- Specific setups only
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
Summary
OpenEMR before 8.3.0 contains an SQL injection vulnerability in the Fee Sheet drug-inventory lookup (DrugSalesService::sellDrug) that interpolates the prod[N][warehouse] POST field into an ORDER BY clause. Low-privileged authenticated users can submit Fee Sheet product lines with constant subqueries to run a time-based blind oracle, extracting patient data and users_secure bcrypt hashes.
cve.now Index
- Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
- Exposure8/25Specific setups only, reachable over the network
- Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
- Severity9.4/10CVSS 9.4
- No patch0/5No signal
What would change the score
- Would score about 67 if added to CISA KEV
- Would score about 62 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
- Would score about 24 if CISA's SSVC rates it automatable
What to do
Check whether your setup matches what the bug needs.
Authenticated user whose role passes the fee_sheet ACL check (encounters|coding), which includes clinical staff such as Clinicians by default. Saving a Fee Sheet product line with the warehouse field in the drug-inventory lookup.Upgrade to a fixed version: 8.3.0.
Timeline
- CVE published
- First seen by cve.now
- Posted on X by cve.now
Affected versions
- openemr openemr
fixed in 8.3.0
Evidence 2
- Advisory
- Link
Corrections
None so far.
Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.
Questions about CVE-2026-124469
Is CVE-2026-124469 being exploited?
It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data
What does this mean?
The warehouse field saved with a Fee Sheet product line is used in a SQL query without proper handling. An authenticated user with the right role can run time-based blind SQL queries that extract patient data and users_secure bcrypt password hashes.Source: github.com, vulncheck.com
Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-124469?
openemr: before 8.3.0.Source: cve.now feed data
Am I affected, and how do I check?
OpenEMR versions before 8.3.0 are affected. The bug requires a role that passes the fee_sheet ACL check (encounters or coding), which includes Clinicians by default. To check, compare the installed OpenEMR version with 8.3.0 and review which roles hold the fee_sheet permission.Source: github.com, vulncheck.com
How do I fix CVE-2026-124469?
Upgrade OpenEMR to 8.3.0 or later. The facts list no workaround.Source: github.com, vulncheck.com