Vikunja 0.24.0 before 2.7.1 Denial of Service via Nil Bucket Filter
- Exploited
- No known exploitation
- Fix
- Fixed in 2.7.1
- Who is exposed
- Not reported
Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 2.7.1.
- Last modified
- FIRST's estimate of the chance attackers exploit it in the next 30 days, updated daily.What do these mean? →
- 0.29% · 21st percentile
- A 0-100 score for how much a CVE matters across the industry: exploitation, exposure, how widely the software is used, severity and whether a fix exists.What do these mean? →
- 8/100 · provisional
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
Summary
Vikunja, a self-hosted task and project management application, can be made to crash on project views by a project admin who saves a filter-mode bucket with an empty filter. The attack is reached remotely over the network, but it requires the attacker to hold project admin rights, and the result is HTTP 500 errors for all project members.
Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.
Read the original description
Vikunja from 0.24.0 before 2.7.1 contains a nil pointer dereference vulnerability that allows project admins to break project views by saving a filter-mode bucket configuration with a null filter. Because validateProjectViewFilters skips nil entries, every subsequent read of the view panics in kanban and task collection code, returning HTTP 500 to all project members.
cve.now Index
- Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
- Exposure3/25Reachable over the network · Unknown: No advisory context yet
- Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
- Severity5.1/10CVSS 5.1
- No patch0/5No signal
What would change the score
- Would score about 63 if added to CISA KEV
- Would score about 58 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
- Would score about 27 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed
What to do
Upgrade to a fixed version: 2.7.1.
Timeline
- CVE published
- First seen by cve.now
Affected versions
- go-vikunja vikunja
From 0.24.0 · fixed in 2.7.1
Evidence 2
- Advisory
- Link
Corrections
None so far.
Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.
Questions about CVE-2026-123507
Is CVE-2026-123507 being exploited?
It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data
Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-123507?
vikunja: from 0.24.0 before 2.7.1.Source: cve.now feed data
How do I fix CVE-2026-123507?
Upgrade to a fixed version: 2.7.1.Source: cve.now feed data