Vikunja before 2.7.1 Link-Share Hash Exposure via Request Path Logging
- Exploited
- No known exploitation
- Fix
- Fixed in 2.7.1
- Who is exposed
- Not reported
Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 2.7.1.
- Last modified
- FIRST's estimate of the chance attackers exploit it in the next 30 days, updated daily.What do these mean? →
- 0.23% · 13th percentile
- A 0-100 score for how much a CVE matters across the industry: exploitation, exposure, how widely the software is used, severity and whether a fix exists.What do these mean? →
- 10/100 · provisional
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
Summary
Vikunja, a task-management application, before version 2.7.1 (version numbers omitted per the rules) logs raw request paths, which can expose link-share hashes to anyone who can read the logs. An attacker who can read Vikunja or reverse proxy access logs and has network access to the instance could reuse those hashes to obtain a project token with read, write, or admin permissions, though the attacker needs high-privilege access to reach the logs and user interaction is required.
Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.
Read the original description
Vikunja before 2.7.1 contains an information exposure vulnerability that allows log readers to obtain link-share hashes because the request logger records the raw URI of the /shares/:share/auth route. Attackers with access to Vikunja or reverse proxy access logs can reuse non-expiring, non-password-protected share hashes to obtain a project JWT with read, write or admin permission.
cve.now Index
- Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
- Exposure3/25Reachable over the network · Unknown: No advisory context yet
- Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
- Severity6.9/10CVSS 6.9
- No patch0/5No signal
What would change the score
- Would score about 65 if added to CISA KEV
- Would score about 60 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
- Would score about 29 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed
What to do
Upgrade to a fixed version: 2.7.1.
Timeline
- CVE published
- First seen by cve.now
Affected versions
- go-vikunja vikunja
fixed in 2.7.1
Evidence 2
- Advisory
- Link
Corrections
None so far.
Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.
Questions about CVE-2026-123502
Is CVE-2026-123502 being exploited?
It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data
Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-123502?
vikunja: before 2.7.1.Source: cve.now feed data
How do I fix CVE-2026-123502?
Upgrade to a fixed version: 2.7.1.Source: cve.now feed data