Skip to main content
← Vulnerabilities

noname v1.11.2 through v1.11.6.1 Missing Authentication in Electron Local File Server

Affects the Electron desktop build of noname v1.11.2 through v1.11.6.1, whose local file server on port 8089 starts automatically with the app and has no authentication.

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

7.7HighCNA
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
Fix or patch referenced
Who is exposed
Specific setups only

Do first: Check whether your setup matches what the bug needs. Electron desktop build of noname The app is running; the local server starts automatically at startup A page is open in a browser on the same machine while the app is running

Published
Last modified
20/100 · provisional
Specific setups only
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub

Summary

The noname Electron desktop build from v1.11.2 through v1.11.6.1 runs an unauthenticated local file server with wildcard CORS, so a malicious website can read, overwrite, or delete installation files. An attacker can reach it remotely without logging in, but the victim must visit the malicious site, and overwriting renderer scripts can lead to JavaScript running with Node.js access as the local user.

Read the original description

noname Electron desktop build v1.11.2 through v1.11.6.1 contains an unauthenticated local file server with wildcard CORS that allows malicious websites to read, overwrite, or delete installation files. Attackers can send cross-origin requests to /writeFile on localhost port 8089 to overwrite renderer scripts, executing JavaScript with Node.js access as the local user.

cve.now Index

20Pcve.now Index 20 of 100 · methodology v3 · provisional
  • Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
  • Exposure12/25Specific setups only, reachable over the network without a login
  • Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
  • Severity7.7/10CVSS 7.7
  • No patch0/5No signal

What would change the score

  • Would score about 70 if added to CISA KEV
  • Would score about 65 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active

What to do

  • Check whether your setup matches what the bug needs.

    Electron desktop build of noname The app is running; the local server starts automatically at startup A page is open in a browser on the same machine while the app is running
  • Apply the patch listed under Evidence.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now

Affected versions

  • libnoname noname

    From v1.11.2 · through v1.11.6.1

Evidence 6

  1. Patch
  2. Patch
  3. Report
  4. Repository
  5. Repository
  6. Link

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

Questions about CVE-2026-123208

Is CVE-2026-123208 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

What does this mean?

The local file server on port 8089 does not require authentication. A web page open in a browser on the same machine while the app is running can read, write, or delete files in the app's installation directory. Overwriting the renderer bundle leads to Node.js code execution on the next window load.Source: github.com

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-123208?

noname: from v1.11.2 through v1.11.6.1.Source: cve.now feed data

Am I affected, and how do I check?

Affected versions are v1.11.2 through v1.11.6.1 of noname, in the Electron desktop build, which bundles @noname/fs. The local server starts automatically at application startup, so check the installed version and whether the Electron desktop build is in use.Source: github.com

How do I fix CVE-2026-123208?

The checked facts do not name a fixed version or a workaround. Check the vendor's advisory for an update that addresses this issue.Source: github.com

Why do the sources disagree?

The description describes a local attack, while the CVSS vector records a network attack vector (AV:N). Both descriptions are shown in the source data without a resolution.Source: github.com