Skip to main content
← Vulnerabilities

Kyverno 1.19.1 before 1.19.2 Privilege Escalation via Policy apiCall urlPath

Kyverno 1.19.1 before 1.19.2 is affected when a namespace-scoped user can create a Policy that uses context.apiCall urlPath. Fixed in 1.19.2.

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

9.4CriticalCNA
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
Fixed in 1.19.2
Who is exposed
Specific setups only

Do first: Check whether your setup matches what the bug needs. Kyverno version 1.19.1 up to but not including 1.19.2 Attacker is a namespace-scoped user who can create a Policy

Published
Last modified
0.36% · 29th percentile
17/100 · provisional
Specific setups only
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
On X
View the cve.now post

Summary

Kyverno, a Kubernetes policy engine, from 1.19.1 before 1.19.2 can be abused to escalate privileges to cluster admin. An attacker reaches it over the network with low-privilege login, such as a namespace-scoped user who can create a Policy, by hiding path traversal sequences behind a fragment or query so Kyverno's ServiceAccount reaches cluster-scoped endpoints.

Read the original description

Kyverno from 1.19.1 before 1.19.2 validates a Policy's context.apiCall urlPath after cleaning it but executes the raw path, whose fragment or query the Kubernetes client discards. A namespace-scoped user who can create a Policy can hide ../ segments behind # or ? to reach cluster-scoped endpoints with Kyverno's ServiceAccount, gaining cluster admin.

cve.now Index

17Pcve.now Index 17 of 100 · methodology v3 · provisional
  • Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
  • Exposure8/25Specific setups only, reachable over the network
  • Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
  • Severity9.4/10CVSS 9.4
  • No patch0/5No signal

What would change the score

  • Would score about 67 if added to CISA KEV
  • Would score about 62 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
  • Would score about 24 if CISA's SSVC rates it automatable

What to do

  • Check whether your setup matches what the bug needs.

    Kyverno version 1.19.1 up to but not including 1.19.2 Attacker is a namespace-scoped user who can create a Policy
  • Upgrade to a fixed version: 1.19.2.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now
  3. Posted on X by cve.now

Affected versions

  • kyverno kyverno

    From 1.19.1 · fixed in 1.19.2

Evidence 2

  1. Advisory
  2. Link

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

Questions about CVE-2026-122310

Is CVE-2026-122310 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

What does this mean?

The bug is in how Kyverno validates the urlPath of a Policy's context.apiCall. A namespace-scoped user who can create a Policy can use it to reach cluster-scoped endpoints with Kyverno's ServiceAccount, which gains cluster admin.Source: vulncheck.com

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-122310?

kyverno: from 1.19.1 before 1.19.2.Source: cve.now feed data

Am I affected, and how do I check?

Kyverno versions from 1.19.1 up to but not including 1.19.2 are in the affected range. The setup condition is a Policy that uses context.apiCall urlPath, and the attacker must be able to create a Policy in a namespace.Source: vulncheck.com

How do I fix CVE-2026-122310?

Upgrade Kyverno to 1.19.2, which is the version the advisory lists as the fix.Source: vulncheck.com