Skip to main content
← Vulnerabilities

NPC-Worldwide npcpy MLX Provider response.py get_mlx_response input validation

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

5.3MediumCNA
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
No fix listed
Who is exposed
Not reported
17Pcve.now Index 17 of 100 · methodology v3 · provisional
  • Exploitation?/40Exploitation: unknown (data gap). No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
  • Exposure7/25Reachable over the network without a login · Data gap: No advisory context yet
  • Reach?/20Reach: unknown (data gap). No tracked technology or package matched
  • Severity5.3/10CVSS 5.3
  • No patch5/5No patch listed yet

What would change the score

  • Would score about 72 if added to CISA KEV
  • Would score about 67 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
  • Would score about 32 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed

CVE-2026-122015 is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. No public exploit code is tracked. It is rated CVSS 5.3 (medium) and affects npcpy; no fixed version is listed yet.

Published
Last modified
Published
Not listed in CISA KEV
17/100 · provisional
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub

Summary

The NPC-Worldwide npcpy software, specifically its MLX Provider component in the get_mlx_response function, mishandles the model argument because it does not properly validate input. An attacker can exploit this remotely without logging in, though it requires a user to take some action.

Read the original description

A vulnerability was found in NPC-Worldwide npcpy up to 2.1.27. This vulnerability affects the function get_mlx_response of the file npcpy/gen/response.py of the component MLX Provider. The manipulation of the argument model results in improper input validation. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now

Affected versions

  • NPC-Worldwide npcpy

    2.1.0, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3, 2.1.4, 2.1.5, 2.1.6, 2.1.7, 2.1.8, 2.1.9, 2.1.10, 2.1.11, 2.1.12, 2.1.13, 2.1.14, 2.1.15, 2.1.16, 2.1.17, 2.1.18, 2.1.19, 2.1.20, 2.1.21, 2.1.22, 2.1.23, 2.1.24, 2.1.25, 2.1.26, 2.1.27

Evidence 7

  1. Advisory
  2. Advisory
  3. Advisory
  4. Advisory
  5. Exploit
Show all 7 sourcesShow fewer sources
  1. Report
  2. Repository

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

FAQ

Questions about CVE-2026-122015

Is CVE-2026-122015 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-122015?

npcpy: versions 2.1.0, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3, 2.1.4 and 23 more.Source: cve.now feed data