Skip to main content
← Vulnerabilities

sngrep through 1.9.0 Infinite Loop DoS via Crafted NFLOG TLV

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

6.8MediumCNA
Exploited
Proof of concept public, per CISA
Fix
No fix listed
Who is exposed
Not reported
27Pcve.now Index 27 of 100 · methodology v3 · provisional
  • Exploitation15/40CISA rates a proof of concept as public
  • Exposure?/25Exposure: unknown (data gap). No advisory context yet
  • Reach?/20Reach: unknown (data gap). No tracked technology or package matched
  • Severity6.8/10CVSS 6.8
  • No patch5/5No patch listed yet

What would change the score

  • Would score about 67 if added to CISA KEV
  • Would score about 62 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
  • Would score about 49 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed

CVE-2026-121944 is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. No public exploit code is tracked. It is rated CVSS 6.8 (medium) and affects sngrep; no fixed version is listed yet.

Published
Last modified
Published
Not listed in CISA KEV
27/100 · provisional
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
  • Exploitation: poc
  • Automatable: no
  • Technical impact: partial

Summary

Sngrep through 1.9.0 has an infinite loop flaw in its packet capture code that a local attacker can trigger by supplying a crafted pcap file with NFLOG link type, causing a denial of service where the capture thread uses full CPU and stops processing packets. The attack requires no login but does need the user to open the malicious file.

Read the original description

sngrep through 1.9.0 contains an infinite loop vulnerability in capture_packet_reasm_ip() in src/capture.c that allows attackers to cause denial of service via crafted NFLOG TLVs. Attackers can supply a pcap file with link type NFLOG containing a non-payload TLV with length under 4, making the capture thread spin at full CPU and stop processing packets.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now
  3. CISA SSVC assessment

    Exploitation: poc · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial

  4. Record last updated

Affected versions

  • irontec sngrep

    through 1.9.0

Evidence 5

  1. Exploit
  2. Report
  3. Repository
  4. Link
  5. Link

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

FAQ

Questions about CVE-2026-121944

Is CVE-2026-121944 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. CISA's SSVC assessment notes a proof of concept exists. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-121944?

sngrep: through 1.9.0.Source: cve.now feed data