SurrealDB from 3.1.0 before 3.3.0 SSRF via JWKS Implicit Default Port Bypass
- Exploited
- No known exploitation
- Fix
- Fixed in 3.3.0
- Who is exposed
- Not reported
Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 3.3.0.
- Exploitation?/40Exploitation: unknown (data gap). No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
- Exposure3/25Reachable over the network · Data gap: No advisory context yet
- Reach?/20Reach: unknown (data gap). No tracked technology or package matched
- Severity5.1/10CVSS 5.1
- No patch0/5No signal
What would change the score
- Would score about 63 if added to CISA KEV
- Would score about 58 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
- Would score about 27 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed
CVE-2026-121422 is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. No public exploit code is tracked. It is rated CVSS 5.1 (medium) and affects surrealdb; fixed in 3.3.0.
- Last modified
- Where the record stands: published, rejected by its publisher, or superseded by another id.What do these mean? →
- Published
- Whether CISA lists it in its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog: proof that attackers are using it.What do these mean? →
- Not listed in CISA KEV
- A 0-100 score for how much a CVE matters across the industry: exploitation, exposure, how widely the software is used, severity and whether a fix exists.What do these mean? →
- 8/100 · provisional
- Fix
- Fixed in 3.3.0
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
Summary
SurrealDB from 3.1.0 before 3.3.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows database Owners to bypass port-specific deny-net rules by using JWKS URLs with implicit default ports. Attackers can configure a JWT or record access method whose JWKS URL omits port 80 or 443, causing blind GET requests to explicitly denied internal services.
What to do
Upgrade to a fixed version: 3.3.0.
Timeline
- CVE published
- First seen by cve.now
Affected versions
- surrealdb surrealdb
From 3.1.0 · fixed in 3.3.0
Evidence 2
- Advisory
- Link
Corrections
None so far.
Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.
Questions about CVE-2026-121422
Is CVE-2026-121422 being exploited?
It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data
Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-121422?
surrealdb: from 3.1.0 before 3.3.0.Source: cve.now feed data
How do I fix CVE-2026-121422?
Upgrade to a fixed version: 3.3.0.Source: cve.now feed data