Skip to main content
← Vulnerabilities

madong-admin-saas through 5.1.4 Missing Authentication via Platform Tenant Management API

8.8HighCNA
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
Fix or patch referenced
Who is exposed
Not reported

Do first: Apply the patch listed under Evidence.

Published
Last modified
Published
Not listed in CISA KEV
16/100 · provisional
Unclear
Fix
Fix or patch referenced
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub

Summary

madong-admin-saas through 5.1.4 contains a missing authentication vulnerability in the platform tenant management API because the 'platformapi' middleware key never matches the 'platform' application. Unauthenticated remote attackers can call /platformapi/tenant/account, bind-plan and sync-data endpoints to list, create, modify, disable or delete tenants and bind subscription plans.

What to do

  • Apply the patch listed under Evidence.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now

Affected versions

  • madong-code madong-admin-saas

    through 5.1.4

Evidence 5

  1. Patch
  2. Report
  3. Repository
  4. Repository
  5. Link

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

FAQ

Questions about CVE-2026-120446

What does this mean?

The platform's tenant management API does not check who is calling it, so a caller without valid credentials can reach it. From there the caller could control all tenants, create platform admins, read tenant database connection settings, and delete or disable tenants.Source: github.com

Am I affected, and how do I check?

All versions of madong-admin-saas through 5.1.4 are listed as affected, but only when the product runs in multi-tenant SaaS mode with tenant.enable set to true. To check, look for tenant.enable in the application configuration and confirm the product version is 5.1.4 or earlier.Source: github.com

What should I do about it?

No fixed version is listed in the checked facts, so no upgrade target can be named from them. Check the vendor's project page for a patched release newer than 5.1.4 before deciding on next steps.Source: github.com

Is it being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data