Skip to main content
← All vulnerabilities
CVE-2026-120201

Jpom 2.10.0 through 2.11.12 Authentication Bypass via JPOM-USER-TOKEN Header

Jpom 2.10.0 through 2.11.12 is affected, and so was the master branch at the time of the advisory. No fixed version is listed.

Published
Last modified
published
Not listed in CISA KEV
Unclear
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
On X
View the cve.now post

Summary

Jpom, a web-based server operations and deployment management tool, is affected by this flaw. An unauthenticated attacker could bypass login and gain super-administrator control, then run commands on the server through Jpom's script features.

Summarized by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5. Verify details against the original sources.

Read the original description

Jpom 2.10.0 through 2.11.12 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to gain super-administrator access by injecting query conditions into the JPOM-USER-TOKEN header. Attackers can send a value like 'is not null', which Hutool's Condition parser treats as an operator, then execute commands through Jpom's script features.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now
  3. Posted on X by cve.now

Affected versions

  • dromara Jpom

    From 2.10.0 · through 2.11.12

References 4

GitHub · dromara/Jpom

vulncheck.com

FAQ

Questions about CVE-2026-120201

What does this mean?

The server passes the JPOM-USER-TOKEN header value to Hutool, which parses it as a query condition. An unauthenticated attacker can obtain a super-administrator session, then run arbitrary commands on the Jpom server and on managed hosts through node features.Source: github.com

Am I affected, and how do I check?

Jpom versions 2.10.0 through 2.11.12 are affected, and the master branch was also affected at the time of the advisory. Compare the installed Jpom version against that range to check the version in use.Source: github.com

What should I do about it?

The checked facts do not name a fixed version or upgrade target, so no specific upgrade can be recommended from them.Source: github.com

Is it being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

What if there's no patch?

The checked facts do not list a workaround or interim mitigation for this issue.Source: github.com