Skip to main content
← All vulnerabilities
CVE-2026-120200

Nexterm through 1.2.2-BETA Missing Authorization in Server Session Lifecycle Routes

Affects Nexterm from 1.0.6-OPEN-PREVIEW through 1.2.2-BETA. CVSS scores it 5.3 (medium), and no vendor severity or fixed version is listed in the checked facts.

Published
Last modified
published
Not listed in CISA KEV
Specific setups only
Fix
Fix or patch referenced
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub

Summary

Nexterm, a remote server management application, is affected by this flaw. An authenticated user can pause, resume, or end other users' live remote sessions, such as SSH, RDP, VNC, or SFTP, which can disrupt their work if they know the session ID.

Summarized by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5. Verify details against the original sources.

Read the original description

Nexterm through 1.2.2-BETA contains a missing authorization vulnerability that allows authenticated users to hibernate, resume, or terminate other users' remote sessions via session lifecycle routes. Attackers who obtain a session ID can call the hibernate, resume, or DELETE connection endpoints to disrupt live SSH, RDP, VNC, or SFTP sessions.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now

Affected versions

  • gnmyt Nexterm

    From 1.0.6-OPEN-PREVIEW · through 1.2.2-BETA

References 6

GitHub · gnmyt/Nexterm

vulncheck.com

FAQ

Questions about CVE-2026-120200

What does this mean?

An authenticated Nexterm user can hibernate, resume, or terminate another user's remote session, which disrupts live SSH, RDP, VNC, or SFTP sessions. The attacker needs to know or obtain that other user's session ID.Source: github.com

Am I affected, and how do I check?

Nexterm versions from 1.0.6-OPEN-PREVIEW through 1.2.2-BETA are in the affected range. To check, compare the installed Nexterm version against that range.Source: github.com

What should I do about it?

The checked facts do not name a fixed version, so no upgrade target is confirmed. Check the Nexterm project for a release that addresses this issue.Source: github.com

Is it being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data