Skip to main content
← All vulnerabilities
CVE-2026-119660EUVD-2026-114076GHSA-77P8-2QMX-794P

MuseBot before 2.0.0 Authentication Bypass via Hard-Coded Session Key

MuseBot versions before 2.0.0 are in scope, with the issue reported against v1.0.42. CVSS scores it 9.3 critical. Fixed in 2.0.0.

Published
Last modified
published
Not listed in CISA KEV
Unclear
Fix
Fixed in 2.0.0
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
On X
View the cve.now post

Summary

MuseBot, a chatbot application, is affected by an authentication bypass flaw caused by a hard-coded default session key. Unauthenticated attackers can forge administrative sessions, giving them full control to read password hashes, chat records, and bot configurations, and to stop bots.

Summarized by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5. Verify details against the original sources.

Read the original description

MuseBot before 2.0.0 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to forge admin sessions by using the hard-coded default session_key 'muse_bot_session_key'. Attackers can sign a MuseBot-session cookie carrying a user_id to gain full administrative access, reading password hashes, chat records, and bot configuration, and stopping bots.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now
  3. Posted on X by cve.now

Affected versions

  • yincongcyincong MuseBot

    fixed in 2.0.0

References 8

GitHub · yincongcyincong/MuseBot

hackmd.io

vulncheck.com

FAQ

Questions about CVE-2026-119660

What does this mean?

MuseBot uses a session key that is hard-coded into the software, so the authentication check can be bypassed. The key is not unique to each installation.Source: github.com

Am I affected, and how do I check?

The affected range is MuseBot from the first release up to but not including 2.0.0. The report cites version v1.0.42, so check the installed MuseBot version against that range.Source: github.com

What should I do about it?

Upgrade MuseBot to version 2.0.0 or later, which is the listed fixed version.Source: github.com

Is it being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data